maust
Just Another Guy
PatsFans.com Supporter
2019 Weekly Picks Winner
2020 Weekly Picks Winner
2021 Weekly Picks Winner
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2018
- Messages
- 10,353
- Reaction score
- 22,609
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I'd rather Alex Guerrero end up QB2 than Kizer.
I just wanted to say that, I actually know **** all about Kizer so whatever if he ends up here.
I think there's little doubt that Kizer could be useful. He showed some very nice flashes in the 0-16 season, and frequently put the team in position to win only to be let down by the D or the special teams, and at least a handful of his picks are squarely the fault of that weak offensive lineIf our coaches spot something while viewing film that indicates that he *could be* useful
Kizer, and a lack of quality QB play overall, were the direct reasons that team was as bad as it was.I think there's little doubt that Kizer could be useful. He showed some very nice flashes in the 0-16 season, and frequently put the team in position to win only to be let down by the D or the special teams, and at least a handful of his picks are squarely the fault of that weak offensive line
Kizer is not the reason that that team was terrible, and I personally think he's worth working with to see what he could do in a better offensive scheme. If the Browns disagree, the kid might be available for pennies, and if that's the case, I think it would be smart to check it out and see what might be there.
It's the old adage, things are never as bad as they seem when they're at their worst, or as good as their best. Kizer is not exactly what he appears to be at the moment. If the Browns draft a QB high, Kizer represents a buy low opportunity with more than a little talent.
Arm is not bad, he can use his feet, release is actually above average, accuracy isn't bad, it all just comes down to what you think of the head component. And I don't think a rookie campaign with the Browns is going to show that in its best light.
Hue was not to blame, that’s for sure. Nobody could have done better. Bill certainly isn’t getting that team any wins.Amazing how a commentary on poor QB play being a direct reason for a winless season gets a “disagree”. No follow up, of course.
I don’t think Jackson is much of a head coach, but I don’t think he’s that bad either. He was largely betrayed by his front office saddling him with Kizer instead of Watson. They also could have had Wentz in 2016 if they had stayed put.Hue was not to blame, that’s for sure. Nobody could have done better. Bill certainly isn’t getting that team any wins.
His arrogance is pretty funny. Whatever QB Cleveland passes on in this draft, we know will be a stud. I love when their front office misses on a guy like Jimmy and realizes he’s great and then starts a rumor that they offered a bunch for him.I don’t think Jackson is much of a head coach, but I don’t think he’s that bad either. He was largely betrayed by his front office saddling him with Kizer instead of Watson. They also could have had Wentz in 2016 if they had stayed put.
What should I have followed up with? Your post basically disagreed with mine while not actually responding to anything I'd been saying all thread. I figured, and I don't think I'm wrong, that a "disagree" was all that kind of comment rated unless you were willing to go to the trouble of making an argument.Amazing how a commentary on poor QB play being a direct reason for a winless season gets a “disagree”. No follow up, of course.
I don’t think that anything else needed to be responded to. It’s pretty well known that the quarterback position is usually one of the biggest, if not THE biggest, reason for an winless season. I mean, that’s just basic football. If the guy that touches the football on essentially every single offensive down (with the exception of gadget plays and formations) is a liability, as Kizer was, you’re not winning many games.What should I have followed up with? Your post basically disagreed with mine while not actually responding to anything I'd been saying all thread. I figured, and I don't think I'm wrong, that a "disagree" was all that kind of comment rated unless you were willing to go to the trouble of making an argument.
I really disagree with this. That Browns team showed flashes of real talent. The problem is twofold.Hue was not to blame, that’s for sure. Nobody could have done better. Bill certainly isn’t getting that team any wins.
As a general rule, yes, I agree. The problem is that the Browns' management of their roster is exceptionally bad.I don’t think that anything else needed to be responded to. It’s pretty well known that the quarterback position is usually one of the biggest, if not THE biggest, reason for an winless season. I mean, that’s just basic football. If the guy that touches the football on essentially every single offensive down (with the exception of gadget plays and formations) is a liability, as Kizer was, you’re not winning many games.