VegasGuy
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2017
- Messages
- 3,276
- Reaction score
- 2,171
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I think the Pats win by at least 10. But to say the Steelers match up better tells me you’ve only watched the Wild Card game and this one. They don’t. That’s not even debateable. But I’ll let it go because the mere fact that you’re unwilling to answer those questions tells me that you know where I’m coming from. Defensively they have the pieces to make life hard for Brady. Offensively, without a healthy Fournette, they will give the Pats the game.This will be a blowout.
The crazy thing is we're not even exploiting a weakness that way since their LBs are quick and damn good, but it's preferable to throwing on Ramsey and Bouye.
Yeah, I know I’ll get some crap for saying this, but I have a hard time envisioning Brandin Cooks making those catches.
Bortles game today was on point with any game Eli had in the 2007 postseason, statistically. He had a better season than Eli had in 2007. But let me ask you these questions, because I’m not sure how many Jags games you have watched this season and would like to gauge your knowledge of them...
1. They can rush the passer with just their front four: yes or no?
2. Their linebackers are smaller but can cover: yes or no?
3. They have two All-Pro outside corners: yes or no?
They are a FAR better matchup for us. Their offense is incapable at this point of competing with us. Our offense is too good to be held down to that level. Sure you can find one game in history where a team with a hit qb who wasn’t a ton better than a currently dysfunctional bortles to try and make a argument but there are years of games that support otherwise.I think the Pats win by at least 10. But to say the Steelers match up better tells me you’ve only watched the Wild Card game and this one. They don’t. That’s not even debateable. But I’ll let it go because the mere fact that you’re unwilling to answer those questions tells me that you know where I’m coming from. Defensively they have the pieces to make life hard for Brady. Offensively, without a healthy Fournette, they will give the Pats the game.
Their offense is the major question mark. I think Brady will hit the deck a good bit next week, but they’ll pull away in the second half after an INT or two by Bortles.Agree completely. I think their defense is really talented and the Patriots are going to have to play a really good game to put up 24 + points against them, but their offense is really questionable, and I think they will handle them and get the turnovers to break the game their way.
38. Jax got one defensive score, but larger point stands. Not good.Bortles laid 45 on that ****tsburg D..Imagine what Brady would have done
This team would have CRUSHED Pittsburgh and it isn’t even remotely debateable. Bortles, who you are maligning in this very thread, guided the inferior Jaguars to 38 points against that D. Brady, with a full compliment, would have put 45-48 on them and Ben is not the same QB on the road. The Jags present the better coaching staff, the better OL, and the better D by far. They are the better match-up for the Patriots and they’re the reason why you think that the team that somehow was the better match-up in spite of the fact that they routinely get pasted by Brady are sitting home.They are a FAR better matchup for us. Their offense is incapable at this point of competing with us. Our offense is too good to be held down to that level. Sure you can find one game in history where a team with a hit qb who wasn’t a ton better than a currently dysfunctional bortles to try and make a argument but there are years of games that support otherwise.
We would have lost to Pittsburgh a month ago if they didn’t drop a wide open easy 7 yard pass.
We matchup favorably against anyone but Pittsburgh was by far the closest to us in the afc
Jacksonville will not have an easy catch to make to beat us.
As opposed to Mark Sanchez, Eli (twice), and Flacco (twice)...The Steelers has their seasons ended by Blake Bortles, David Garrard and Tim Tebow.
Woof.
This team would have CRUSHED Pittsburgh and it isn’t even remotely debateable. Bortles, who you are maligning in this very thread, guided the inferior Jaguars to 38 points against that D. Brady, with a full compliment, would have put 45-48 on them and Ben is not the same QB on the road. The Jags present the better coaching staff, the better OL, and the better D by far. They are the better match-up for the Patriots and they’re the reason why you think that the team that somehow was the better match-up in spite of the fact that they routinely get pasted by Brady are sitting home.
That's kinda how I'm seeing it too.Their offense is the major question mark. I think Brady will hit the deck a good bit next week, but they’ll pull away in the second half after an INT or two by Bortles.
OMG HE'S BACK. lmaoooooo his shirt. Imagine being that mind****ed.
A month ago we didn’t CRUSH them we won by the slimmest margin imaginable.This team would have CRUSHED Pittsburgh and it isn’t even remotely debateable. Bortles, who you are maligning in this very thread, guided the inferior Jaguars to 38 points against that D. Brady, with a full compliment, would have put 45-48 on them and Ben is not the same QB on the road. The Jags present the better coaching staff, the better OL, and the better D by far. They are the better match-up for the Patriots and they’re the reason why you think that the team that somehow was the better match-up in spite of the fact that they routinely get pasted by Brady are sitting home.
Bortles laid 45 on that ****tsburg D..Imagine what Brady would have done