Nope.
The absence of three decent players is not enough of a talent drain to explain what is going on. Nor is it a sufficient explanation when you add in the difference in schedule (which isn't much, given how much Car and Hou were struggling heading into their respective match ups).
There simply must be something else going on. Which, I suppose, is good news. That "something" might be fixable in ways that a pure talent deficiency isn't.
People need to realize that a season is 16 different games.
Other than w or l what happens in one game does not carry forward.
So far the defense has been awful in the second half/4th quarter of the KC game, consistently mediocre (and a mediocre defense that makes 4-5 key plays in a game is a very good one) vs Houston and awful yesterday.
That equals zero points for any future opponent.
If we are talking about feelings and comfort levels and predictions those Hingis may matter but we are talking about football games and the patriots will dissect the issues, the technique problems, the misuse of players in roles, the game plan and play calls, the assessment of the players and what they can do and come back and approach the futures games differently based upon that self scouting.
That is that happens and that is why teams that look good or bad in October don't necessarily look good or bad in December.
Just like halftime adjustments can make a game change 180 degrees a season is a 17 week long series of adjustments
We make them better than any other.
We recently had a large thread on this board saying the patriots would have been better if they lost games in 2007 and now we have this hysteria because they lost games.
Frankly every team every season in every unit has areas of suck that can be exposed. I find it comforting that ours were exposed so early so that they can be addressed over the next 4 months.