We earned the loss, and this doesn't constitute a "problem" for the NYFL, so much as a given. Teams will worry more, or less, about being penalized. That's a given.
Now when it's the Patriots doing any of that, that's a problem. Hence the 2004 "point of emphasis."
In general, I thought that the refs were not really in mid-season form in having the game clearly and confidently under control. Witness the fact that we didn't get a clear call and explanation on the one-guy-calls-a-fair-catch-another-guy-advances-the-ball play. (Michaels also appeared to be out of it.)
But the Patriots were lousy in pretty much every area (McDaniels' play-calling excepted) and the Chiefs played really, really well. Congratulations to them.
I'm not sure how it was an alright game in terms of play calling. The 2 runs up the middle on 4th and inches into a KC defense that sold out to stop a run up the middle were pretty weak play calls. They also really failed to get their running backs involved in the passing game.
We won at least one Super Bowl on the back of this strategy, and yeah that was 15+ years ago now but even still I'd feel like an outrageous hypocrite if I started complaining much. It's a well-established strategy and we need to do a better job of beating it.
Why? what does what the Pats did 15 years ago matter today? KC was holding all over the field, and not just on receivers. The KC touchdown where the TE just drove the Pats DB 5 yards into the end zone, extended his arm to clear out some space, then turned around and caught a TD in the first half was ridiculous. It's ridiculous mostly because Gronk gets called for far less all the time. So yes, the refs could and probably should have called a lot more on KC, but on the other hand, in the end, this did not cost the Pats the game. The Pats own this loss, not the refs
Berry has zero chance of ever dominating Gronk. He was cheating. And Gronk looked off anyway. He looked slow and when they cut to him on the sidelines he looked a little sick.
The thing that frustrated me the most last night (push aside the coaching and the collapse) was there appears to be one rule for Gronk and one rule for everyone else. I like tough, dominating D but there's a fine line between playing tight D and clearly mugging a guy after the snap.
Gronk has been made a target by the league office for some reason
They called him for OPI last year more times than any single team had called on them all year
Defenders can pretty much get away with whatever they want with Gronk because of his size, when they grab an arm and pull he's so big that it doesn't really change his trajectory or route much but I'm sure it does impact his ability to make the play somewhat
On the other end of the spectrum you have Cooks, who even with the lightest grab will have his whole body jerk, or will very noticeably change direction or slow down from the contact because he doesn't have the mass that Gronk has
I would try to incorporate the old Flacco special with Cooks... but I don't think there is anything we can do about Gronk... the league refuses to call PI on him because of his strength and size, and if he tries to get physical back with the defender they won't hesitate to call him for OPI.. I swear it's a directive that came from the league office... They told all the refs to emphasize more OPI and probably played 50 videos of Gronk to turn them into flag throwing Manchurian candidates when it comes to Gronk/Pats
I was thinking the same thing.........count me as one of the rare people that actually likes refs that allow defenses to, well, 'play defense'. Honestly I thought even some of the calls that they did make against the Chiefs were somewhat ticky tacky....but that's fine....there are going to be some bad calls/non calls. I actually liked that they let them play.
I love when they "let them play" as well. so long as they're calling the game the same way for both sides
The officiating was meh last night but doesn't even scratch the top 10 for reasons why they lost
Going forward tho, I'll be curious to see how the league treats Gronk. In 2015 it was a &$@*ing joke all the OPI they called on him and what they let defenders get away with doing to him
Berry has zero chance of ever dominating Gronk. He was cheating. And Gronk looked off anyway. He looked slow and when they cut to him on the sidelines he looked a little sick.