PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

Article: The Secrets of Tom Brady's Personal Trainer

Status
Not open for further replies.
Gee I cannot wait until we discuss what happens in the colon and anus.

 
Gout is believed to be caused by high uric acid levels in the blood. Science seems to agree that uric acid levels can be controlled to some degree by diet. So, here we have a condition caused by an acid buildup in the blood, and scientific evidence that the amounts of that acid in the blood can be controlled by diet.

It seems possible that AG could be right about his diet recommendations, but for reasons not yet understood by science.
 
Daddy: Are you ladies out here talking about Colonel Angus?

Melinda: Yes, Daddy! I can't wait to meet him!

Daddy: Oh, watch out, Melinda! Once a woman is introduced to Colonel Angus, she'll settle for nothing less.

Melinda: Daddy, they say all the womenfolk just love Colonel Angus!

Daddy: Hmm.. I don't know why people make such a big fuss over Colonel Angus!

Miss Anabelle: I myself never much cared for Colonel Angus! He rubs me the wrong way. I'm not sure why.. can't put my finger on it..
 
Gout is believed to be caused by high uric acid levels in the blood.

Gout is caused by uric acid forming crystals in the joints.

The blood may carry varying amounts of a substance, like uric acid, but that doesn't mean the blood in those instances varies widely in pH. The uric acid can be in salt form, i.e., urate anions. That's actually the dominant species in the blood.
 
Gout is believed to be caused by high uric acid levels in the blood. Science seems to agree that uric acid levels can be controlled to some degree by diet

Yes - but this has nothing to do with acid/base balance or even inflammation. For some people there is something in tomato (likely a polyphenol) that does seem to increase urate levels in blood. People get confused by the word "acid" in "uric acid" - and naively assume gout has something to do with acidity, which is flat wrong.

Here's the tomato/gout link:

Positive association of tomato consumption with serum urate: support for tomato consumption as an anecdotal trigger of gout flares
 
Yes - but this has nothing to do with acid/base balance or even inflammation. For some people there is something in tomato (likely a polyphenol) that does seem to increase urate levels in blood. People get confused by the word "acid" in "uric acid" - and naively assume gout has something to do with acidity, which is flat wrong.

Here's the tomato/gout link:

Positive association of tomato consumption with serum urate: support for tomato consumption as an anecdotal trigger of gout flares
Which supports the point I was trying to make. Tomatoes may in fact cause inflammation of joints, not because of PH balance but because of high serum urate.
 
Acid-base disorders, when the usual homeostatic mechanisms are thrown off (either by disease or behavior such as bulemia) are serious cause for concern. Some review articles on acid-base disorders (acidosis and alkalosis):
Treatment of acidosis can involve IV injection of a base (bicarbonate), but note this is a controversial approach partly because it messes with your blood pH (Bicarbonate therapy in severe metabolic acidosis. - PubMed - NCBI).

It has become pretty common to use sodium bicarbonate, orally ingested, before exercise (the theory is to counter lactic acid), and it is known to cause an increase in blood pH. For one particularly well-designed study, see The Reproducibility of Blood Acid Base Responses in Male Collegiate Athletes Following Individualised Doses of Sodium Bicarbonate.

Here is a plot from that study of blood pH (mean/sem) in controls (squares) versus treatments (circles and triangles) with sodium bicarbonate oral ingestion:



Clearly, orally ingesting a base can increase your blood pH significantly.Despite the fact that it has to go through your highly acidic stomach.

The question is, can the amounts we take in diet do the same, and does voluntary alkalosis actually influence performance in sports? It can be dangerous to mess with blood pH (hence the hesitancy to use bicarbonate IV even in cases of acidosis) so I would be *very* careful. In fact, I wouldn't mess with it.

Whether it actually improves sports performance, this is also controversial but studies suggest a modest effect (Effects of sodium bicarbonate ingestion on anaerobic performance: a meta-analytic review. - PubMed - NCBI). This is why some sports agencies have considered banning it.

You can test for it by testing for... you guessed it, high pH of urine! This is discussed in this paper (Changes in urinary pH following bicarbonate loading. - PubMed - NCBI) where the last line of the abstract reads, "These data indicate that urinary pH may be a suitable parameter for detection of bicarbonate doping." The problem is there are likely lots of false positives: you can generate alkaline urine via other means than taking sodium bicarbonate, so it likely would never fly as a test.

Upshot

I'm a skeptic in general. I like evidence-based medicine, and think homeopathy and chiropractic "medicine" are ******** (and I still do). I honestly went into Pubmed thinking I was going to debunk this stuff about pH, but came away realizing it is a lot more complicated than the people here crapping on the theories might lead you to believe. Note I'm not endorsing any weird diets or theories of blood pH being the cure for anything. I frankly wouldn't mess with that stuff. I'm just saying, after researching this for a little while this afternoon: it isn't all that simple. Ingesting things can significantly influence your blood pH, and this may have influence on athletic performance. Does this translate to eating high pH foods? I can't say, but I frankly would be surprised (because there's a world of difference between eating asparagus and taking a bunch of sodium bicarbonate) , but I have run out of energy to do more research. I'll wager this, though: eating healthy will make you healthier. So if those high alkaline foods are asparagus, broccoli, cabbage, etc, then go for it.
 
Last edited:
Upshot
I'm a skeptic in general. I like evidence-based medicine, and think homeopathy and chiropractic "medicine" are ******** (and I still do). I honestly went into Pubmed thinking I was going to debunk this stuff about pH, but came away realizing it is a lot more complicated than the people here crapping on the theories might lead you to believe. Note I'm not endorsing any weird diets or theories of blood pH being the cure for anything. ...... but I have run out of energy to do more research. I'll wager this, though: eating healthy will make you healthier. So if those high alkaline foods are asparagus, broccoli, cabbage, etc, then go for it.

I had almost the same experience as you yesterday.

Lots of the "blog" type articles out there claiming to have the diet perfected were pseudoscience in that they were loose with terminology to the point that their statements demonstrated no real expertise, but merely a vague summary of something that makes sense to the author.

This website ( Alkaline Diet Proof: Scientific Evidence - Live Energized) demonstrates the "vague blog language" I mentioned, but also lists a series of seemingly legitimate studies (especially pertaining to specialized diets for people with kidney disease).

Food for thought. I agree with your conclusion that it's not surprising that practicing the alkaline diet yields healthy results, given the seemingly healthy and nutritious foods it ends up recommending, even if their explanation for why the diet works is not convincing or fully coherent. It boils down very similarly to the useful mantra from the author Michael Pollan: "Eat food. Not too much. Mostly plants."
 
)...
I'm a skeptic in general. I like evidence-based medicine, and think homeopathy and chiropractic "medicine" are ******** (and I still do). ...
I was raised in a staunchly AMA family, conventional medicine was science all else was witch doctors, so I shared your view of chiropractors. Until my ex-wife took me to the chiropractor for the first time. He ran his hands up and down my spine, poked four spots. Each of them was a focus of discomfort, and he did not miss any other such focal points. He moved them around, I felt better. My views about chiropractic changed that day. Evidence based.

Since then I've seen other chiropractors. Some as good, others not so. Seems to me that dismissing something dogmatically misses the chance to learn from it. There may be some truth even if it superficially flies in the face of accepted understanding.
 
I was raised in a staunchly AMA family, conventional medicine was science all else was witch doctors, so I shared your view of chiropractors. Until my ex-wife took me to the chiropractor for the first time. He ran his hands up and down my spine, poked four spots. Each of them was a focus of discomfort, and he did not miss any other such focal points. He moved them around, I felt better. My views about chiropractic changed that day. Evidence based.

Since then I've seen other chiropractors. Some as good, others not so. Seems to me that dismissing something dogmatically misses the chance to learn from it. There may be some truth even if it superficially flies in the face of accepted understanding.
Chiropractors who are basically PTs under a different name are one thing. Chiropractors who think all sorts of diseases are caused by "subluxations" are something else.
 
I was raised in a staunchly AMA family, conventional medicine was science all else was witch doctors, so I shared your view of chiropractors. Until my ex-wife took me to the chiropractor for the first time. He ran his hands up and down my spine, poked four spots. Each of them was a focus of discomfort, and he did not miss any other such focal points. He moved them around, I felt better. My views about chiropractic changed that day. Evidence based.

Since then I've seen other chiropractors. Some as good, others not so. Seems to me that dismissing something dogmatically misses the chance to learn from it. There may be some truth even if it superficially flies in the face of accepted understanding.

That's great and I hope it helped, but anecdotal evidence is not really what I'm talking about. Drugs have to go through double-blind clinical trials before they are brought to market. Especially chronic pain conditions, placebo can be significant for months. It's a big problem in terms of chicanery. Did that concoction help because it relieves pain at a molecular level (and would whether you wanted it to or not), or because of placebo? Let's do a double blinded study to find out. If it's placebo, maybe you dont' care and still want to take it, but hopefully you won't want to spend 5000 dollars a month for it.

Note I'm not saying placebo effect is fake. I'm saying it is very real. But it doesn't cure cancer.
 
Chiropractors who are basically PTs under a different name are one thing. Chiropractors who think all sorts of diseases are caused by "subluxations" are something else.

My favorite PT was a chiropractor. The "adjustments" he did were useless, but he gave me some great exercises to do for my back. The theory they work with is about as useful as the theory that acupuncture is based on.
 
This trainer's muscle/brain connection theories on the other hand make a lot of sense.

Those theories are also common though in the medical community.

A spine doctor even pointed me to a diagnosis called pseudo(something) which basically said that the nerves were sending signals to the brain based on learned reaction to a spinal injury, and that now that the healing was complete, the trick was to do rehab that retrained the brain's relation to the spine.
 
Does anyone know specifically what stretching exercises are being referenced here? I'd like to look them up on a youtube video.

Pliability stretching.
 
I was capable of higher highs and greater feats when adhering to beliefs that were obviously false and irrational.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
MORSE: Patriots Mock Draft 6 – A Week Before the Draft
TRANSCRIPT: Eliot Wolf Pre-Draft Press Conference 4/13
Patriots News 04-12, What To Watch For In The NFL Draft
MORSE: Pre-Draft Patriots News and Notes
MORSE: Patriots Mock Draft 5
MORSE: Patriots Mock Draft 5
Mark Morse
1 week ago
Patriots Part Ways with Another Linebacker as Offseason Roster Shake-Up Continues
Patriots News 04-05, Mock Draft 2.0, Patriots Look For OL Depth
MORSE: 18 Game Schedule and Other Patriots Notes
TRANSCRIPT: Mike Vrabel Press Conference at the League Meetings 3/31
MORSE: Smokescreens and Misinformation Leading Up to Patriots Draft
Back
Top