- Joined
- Feb 27, 2010
- Messages
- 12,090
- Reaction score
- 17,862
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Brady to FloydSign the beast
Many on the Cards Forum think "the wily old fox in NE" has made another brilliant move. Also, their discussion is at ~ 320 posts and ours is ~480. Pretty hot topic! Fun times!
OK this will enhace our outlaw imageMany on the Cards Forum think "the wily old fox in NE" has made another brilliant move. Also, their discussion is at ~ 320 posts and ours is ~480. Pretty hot topic! Fun times!
Seems he will actually play this week (heard he will be traveling with the team). I wonder about what they are planning. He can only run simple routes and probably not make adjustments.
Not a good match up for him either vs these CBs.
"This is Houston, we have a Roger Goodell sighting..."Yea this pretty much sums it up.
I've been thinking about this but more specifically in the AFC.
If I'm a team like KC, Pitt, BAL, MIA, TN, HOU or even Indy and I'm in the same conference as NE, I KNOW for a fact I will need to score 28 or more points to win a playoff game vs them. Why would I not roll the dice and sign this guy? If you look at all of those teams at WR2 and WR3, Floyd is an upgrade. He may not be a big upgrade for some of them but an upgrade nonetheless
Are they more concerned about the $1.3m than beating NE in the playoffs?
Do they think their system is too complicated?
Do they think he'll be destructive?
IMO these teams are being too conservative and its gonna bite them in the ass.
Yup, and have Gisele fix up the guest bedroom...you know, roommates bond like thatBefore I liked the move.
Now I'm excited about it.
If he and TB12 can do a quick Vulcan mind meld session and get some trust going this move willbe considered a masterstroke
I bet fitz wishes he was in floyd's shoes. Larry would have been great here. Good guy in the locker room. Very professional.
Thanks for the catch on that.
Great stuff from Mike! I hadn't thought about the angle that he played for Charlie Weiss at ND - - there's the voice that may have been whispering in BB's ear......
You think Bill Belichick is going to have a player who was here for one practice as an active WR against the league's number #1 passing defense, during what likely will be a gameplan designed for running/taking advantage of RB vs LB?Seems he will actually play this week (heard he will be traveling with the team). I wonder about what they are planning. He can only run simple routes and probably not make adjustments.
Not a good match up for him either vs these CBs.
You think Bill Belichick is going to have a player who was here for one practice as an active WR against the league's number #1 passing defense, during what likely will be a gameplan designed for running/taking advantage of RB vs LB?
That would be awfully surprising, wouldn't it?
You think Bill Belichick is going to have a player who was here for one practice as an active WR against the league's number #1 passing defense, during what likely will be a gameplan designed for running/taking advantage of RB vs LB?
That would be awfully surprising, wouldn't it?
They didn't have a fourth WR last week except for Slater. Why would that change this week?Not if they were at normal strength for WR. But they only have 3 other WR's available for the game and only 1 TE who has ever caught an NFL pass.
Not saying he will definitely be active, but I can see a case for it. In this particular situation, they need the body.
That was part of my reasoning, as well. I also think our game Sunday will be attacking some other areas like TEN and ATL did to them, which would lessen the need for a 4th active WR.They didn't have a fourth WR last week except for Slater. Why would that change this week?
| 13 | 441 |
| 256 | 30K |
| 30 | 3K |
| 16 | 1K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 7 - April 22 (Through 26yrs)











