This is almost a rehash of the whole Bill Parcells tampering before the Superbowl in 1997 and then stealing Curtis Martin with the poison pill contract.
Back then the league ruled against the Rats and awarded the Pats four rodent draft picks. I remember the Rats being incensed and felt they had been sorely used. After all the Pats were nobodies, and if the Rats wanted Parcells then they should be allowed to have him, no strings attached.
I think the fact that they tampered BEFORE the game rather than after was not a "bug", it was a feature. They didn't want to see the Pats win a Superbowl since the Rats hadn't won one in so long.
So Parcells joins the Rats, and as his longtime DC, BB follows him there, while the league forces the Rats to compensate the Pats.
Now fast-forward four years and Parcells is getting ready to step down as HC, but the Pats are looking for a new HC and want to interview BB. I don't recall if the Rats formally denied the request, but I think they pulled their "Parcells as consultant" sham that automatically elevated BB to the Rats' HC position, and as a result he wouldn't be available to the Pats.
BB threw the monkey wrench into the gears when he resigned as Rats HC, as he wasn't going to let them force him into a situation he didn't want to be in. It seemed like the Rats saw this as an affront equivalent to them getting penalized for stealing Parcells, so they were going to make sure they got compensated by the Pats for BB, who was on the Rats staff since he was essentially part of the original Parcells heist, as they had been for Parcells.
The Rats saw this as equivalent when it really was anything but. The Pats requested permission to interview BB for HC, a permission normally granted by other teams, but with Parcells the Rats just took what they wanted, regardless, or even because of the harm it caused to another team.
For the Rats to consider both cases equivalent shows just what a cretinous, scummy franchise they are.
It turns out that, by the letter of the contract, the Rats had a legally binding contract, and they could prevent BB from coaching for another team unless the Rats released him from his contract. The price turned out to be the Pats #1 pick, and the Rats extorted it from the Pats.
Now, with this latest tampering charge, it is just the same kind of scummy practice from the same scummy franchise that has a history of acting this way. THIS time however, it doesn't seem like they have a "legally binding contract" to fall back on, and this latest escapade should blow up in their faces.
As mentioned before by others, this is essentially showing contempt for the tampering rules and could (and should) result in a stiffer penalty to the Rats.