The post you quoted is a perfect example of why
A.) I have that poster on ignore, since he likes to follow me around and nip at my heels, even knowing that he's on ignore,
and
B.) I didn't post any "right/wrong" list of mine in order to try letting the thread go on without confrontation. IcyPatriot insists that he can find a whole bunch of things I've been wrong about, so he's welcome to do so in this (or any) thread.
Now, back to your regularly scheduled programming....
There's that tired phrase of yours "nipping at my heels"... It is a great example of why you come across as condescending and patronizing in your posts.
Yes, of course you would know that I am perfectly aware that you have me on ignore. You after all took great effort in making sure I knew you were doing so by being as personal and insulting as you could at the time.
In that thread by the way, I and others called you out for referring to Belichick as a Machiavellian idiot...
... you in exchange called us bleating sheep.
And in the posts that followed, I got the better of you a bit and a few of the other posters started crowing about it.
In the cliche of those that dish it being unable to take it, you put me on ignore but made sure to write a paragraph of "bah bah you're an unthinking sheep" references as you announced your intention to do so.
So yes.. since then it has become a little personal I suppose, that joke came about, not from me following you around, but because I found the following to be funny.
a) You have a very prolific history of being confrontational. You refer to this as your admittedly "aggressive posting style".)
b) You have a reputation for being incapable of admitting you are wrong.
c) You came into a thread about people sharing all the ways they've been wrong... and instead of participating you chose to express the hope that the thread remain non-confrontational.
So dichotomy of c) being very like one thing and very much unlike another..
