- Joined
- Mar 15, 2013
- Messages
- 9,151
- Reaction score
- 13,527
I have no objection to pointing out misfires when appropriate. It is no different than when someone posts film demonstrating that so-and-so screwed up his coverage responsibilities.
What amuses me is when fans pry out failures in an otherwise excellent draft as if there is some mythical team out there that never misses on a draft pick. That is the underlying subtext and why it is relevant to remind the board once in a while that Bill's drafting compares favorably to supposedly superior GMs in the last 5 years and in his tenure.
Exactly, and that's my point.
The Patriots are never in a great draft position, even when they have a lot of picks. They're ALWAYS at the bottom of the first round, because they're ALWAYS in the hunt.
So they take fliers, sometimes based on health concerns, sometimes based on character issues, sometimes based on things they see in someone beyond the scouting reports. They do it with free agents and they do it with trades and with the draft.
Corey Dillon was a troublemaker.
Ditto LaGarrett Blount.
Moss was washed up.
Kelly is over-the-hill.
Welker wasn't worth what they paid.
Gronk was a health concern.
Dowling a health concern.
Wilson drafted too high.
And on and on. Some work out, others don't. The thing is, the Pats DO NOT draft high enough to take "safe" picks to continue to fill out every position. Teams like the Seahawks rise to prominence now because they've been drafting in the top of the first round for the last decade. The Colts' future is bright because they were the worst team in football in a year when a generational QB was coming out.
Yet without all of that, the Pats continue to win, and it's not just Brady. There's a reason why the last 5 guys cut from the Pats each year get snapped up.
So sure, call it out when they screw, but pretending that you're somehow "giving it" to BB is pathetic. And wallowing in misery over a sports franchise where every post is wah effing wah...I mean, really?












