I hated the last weeks of the 2007 season. It became apparent that strong defensive well coached teams were figuring out how to stop the Pats flying circus. It felt to me that the weeks before the SB were full of unwarranted hubris and expectations, uncharacteristic of prior Pats Championship teams. Being away from NE and with no laptop I completely missed the Thomase fiasco as I don't waste time watching pundits and just tune in for the game. A feeling of dread, never felt before swept over me.
I'm more confident and optimistic this game, not because I think this year's team is better, certainly not on D, but I think this cadre of payers & coaches is more resilient and is better prepared and mentally ready to take a few punches and Gronk back.
Good points and I agree. And yeah, the '07 team was over-confident. Still, it's weird to me how people are quicker to mock a team that went for perfection and came up short in the final game, but go easy on the Colts who INTENTIONALLY THREW A GAME to avoid going unbeaten, AND choked in the Super Bowl to boot.
Anyway, I did some basic math on '07 vs. '11 late in the season:
Final 5 regular season:
'07: Won by average of 29.4-17.8. Over 30 points twice. Over 40 zero. Scoring totals: 27, 34, 20, 28, 38.
'11: Won by average of 36.4-23.8. Over 30 points 4 times. Over 40 twice. Scoring totals: 31, 34, 41, 27, 49.
First two playoff games:
'07: Won by average of 26-16
'11: Won by average of 34-15
AFCCGs were kind of similar (21-12; 23-20).
No doubt the '11 offense found a higher gear later in the season and did not peak as early as '07. As for the playoffs: Pretty small sample, and only time will tell if the 45 on Denver was a fluke against a team that shouldn't have been there, or a hint of what was to come.