And if Evens does not drop the ball the Ravens put up 27 points on the pats as well. It goes both ways. The ravens offense pales in comparison to the Giants so do you really think it is out of the realm of possibility that Giants score 30+ points? Lastly the Pats defense has faced pathetic QB after pathetic QB. While they have only given up 30 point once this season everybody is throwing 400 yards on them.
As for the turnovers. There has been a few the past two games. The Giants will pressure Brady all game and when QB's are pressured they tend to make bad throws. I am not saying Brady will throw 4 Ints but I think he will throw at least one.
I think it is insane that the pats are favored by 3 points. Makes no sense at all.
There seems to be the perception that the Giants are this and the Giants are that, but is there a reality behind those talking points we've so much of already this week?
Didn't we just go through pretty much the same exact arguments (Pats haven't seen a defense like this, Pats played an 'easy' schedule, etc.) last week with the Ravens? Who won that game again?
As for yards allowed, I thought for sure that had been proven to be a meaningless stat by now, but apparently not. By the way, that vaunted, incredibly unstoppable Giants defense ranked 27th in yards allowed, so you either have think that metric stinks or that that metric stinks; you can't have it both ways.
Why don't you make the same comments about the Pats defense that you do about the Giants defense? The reality is that the Pats forced more turnovers than the Giants did.
I agree that the game could easily go either way. I don't agree with those that seem to feel that the Giants have some huge advantage. The Patriots scored more points than the Giants did, allowed fewer points than the Giants did, forced more turnovers than the Giants did, lost the ball on turnovers fewer times than the Giants did, and won four more games than the Giants did.
Yet the Giants should be favored?
I don't doubt that the Giants will have a couple sacks. I don't doubt that the Pats will turn the ball over at least once. But how about giving the Pats offensive line some credit; they're going to win their share of battles. Why the assumption the Giants will "will pressure Brady all game long"? Why the assumption they'll suddenly go from all-pros to playing no better than the Rams o-line did this year? I am doubting the superficial perceptions that the Giants are an unstoppable juggernaut that cannot possibly be defeated, or that the Patriots are this horrible team that doesn't stand a chance. If you're going to give the Giants credit for the things they are doing well then at least do the same with the Patriots.