You have said over and over that the the 5th Amendment established the right of the Government to take property. That is taking rights from people and giving them to the government. The Bill of Rights established rights for citizens not the government.
This is the height of the ridiculousness of your argument.
The 5th Amendment address Eminnent Domain by giving protection against it, not by creating the right of the government to take property.
I cannot help if you cannot understand the difference.
You have consistently made comments about what they intended.
But you told me it was ESTABLISHED by the 5th Amendment
Adding an Amendment to the Constitution to require equitable compensation in the event Emenant Domain is exercised is not even close to ESTABLISHING it.
Again, you state that it was established when it serves your argument then state that it was not when it serves your argument, and refuse to admit you are wrong on either point after contradicting yourself over and over.
Providing links that do not prove your point is not proving your point. I agree you found links to information about court cases. It would help your argument though, if they actually proved your point, which they do not.
Again, show me the example where the US Judiciary says the Eminent Domain was established in the 5th Amendment. You haven't yet, because you can't.
I have said it many, many times. You claimed that the 5th Amendment ESTABLSIHED the right of Eminant Domain, and then claimed that it did not, and are now flip-flopping within the same post. Adding 'tacit' later doesnt solve the contradiction.
When you state what the founding fathers had in mind as the basis of your argument and I state that you cannot read what was in their mind that is not a strawman that is rejecting the basis of your argument as flawed and arrogant.
You should write shorter posts and spend more time rereading them, becuase this statement doesnt even resemble the truth.
I'm not going to go back and requote every post. The only reason I even bothered to continue this is that you made a ridiculous statement that the 5th Amendment was designed to take rights away from citizens.
You have posted 75,000 words to backtrack from that, and now are denying ever saying it.
Just admit you were wrong, its a lot easier.
It certainly appears that way.
I am trying to discuss the issue, which you continue to dance around.
You admit you said that the 5th Amendment ESTABLISHED the right of the the government to take private property. For some reason you insist on posting volumes to make it seem you didnt mean that, or said something else more often, or something that I cant understand.
You have stated multiple times what the founding fathers intention was.
Those are the issues that you are dancing around, and now claiming you didnt say. You said them both.
I do not need to go back and requote out of volumes of lengthy posts to prove you said what you said.
Which of those 2 statements are you saying I made up and you didnt say?
Again, I suggest you write less and pay closer attention to what you post.
You have consistently used an insulting, condescending attitude throughout this thread. That is not opinion, it is clearly obvious by your comments. I don't know what you are referencing to say I am being dismissive, when in fact, I am responding to every single point you make.
