Simkin
Banned
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2009
- Messages
- 1,103
- Reaction score
- 0
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Where are the naysayers who believed the mantra that Mayo is toast...
I wonder if that was a Freudian slip on his part. Maybe hes hungryNobody ever said Mayo is toast. They said they like mayo on toasted sandwiches.
I'm not going to pretend i'm an X's and O's guy, but i can think of several factors. The D seemed to bet set up to have the Ravens running game funneled into the middle were Spikes and Mayo were waiting. And if a player is good like Mayo is he has great lateral movement and speed. He can get to chase someone down to make the tackle.This is probably an insanely stupid question but I'm dumb enough to ask it anyway. I'm not sure I entirely understand this stat. Maybe someone can explain why this is so good.
Here is my point of confusion: isn't number of tackles mostly a result of time on the field and number of short plays occurring per game? I mean don't most plays tend to end in a tackle? Does this reflect a weakness on others on the D because tackles are not more spread out evenly among them?
This is probably an insanely stupid question but I'm dumb enough to ask it anyway. I'm not sure I entirely understand this stat. Maybe someone can explain why this is so good.
Here is my point of confusion: isn't number of tackles mostly a result of time on the field and number of short plays occurring per game? I mean don't most plays tend to end in a tackle? Does this reflect a weakness on others on the D because tackles are not more spread out evenly among them?
I have always disliked this stat, if your team gets off the field quickly, you dont have the chance to pad your tackle stats. It should be a % based on the #of plays not just a flat number.
IE
15 tackles out of 30 plays
or
15 tackles out of 60 plays.
This is probably an insanely stupid question but I'm dumb enough to ask it anyway. I'm not sure I entirely understand this stat. Maybe someone can explain why this is so good.
Here is my point of confusion: isn't number of tackles mostly a result of time on the field and number of short plays occurring per game? I mean don't most plays tend to end in a tackle? Does this reflect a weakness on others on the D because tackles are not more spread out evenly among them?
Where are the naysayers who believed the mantra that Mayo is toast... he is playing extremely well.
He is not flashy, but a very steady player.. he and Spikes are the real deal.
Also the average Yards per Tackle.
That I don't agree with.
Should you penalize Pat Chung because Kyle Arrington blew his assignment? Or punish Mayo because Ninkovitch couldn't bring a guy down?
This is probably an insanely stupid question but I'm dumb enough to ask it anyway. I'm not sure I entirely understand this stat. Maybe someone can explain why this is so good.
Here is my point of confusion: isn't number of tackles mostly a result of time on the field and number of short plays occurring per game? I mean don't most plays tend to end in a tackle? Does this reflect a weakness on others on the D because tackles are not more spread out evenly among them?
The D line played well. Crable played fairly well also
I think that you were just way ahead of most of us. The very idea was revolutionary. The best ideas are never embraced when introduced.
They both played well vs the run and I'm happy with their performance. But IMO a play maker is a rarer breed. It's the guy who makes the pick only 1 in 100 guys make, or gets to the qb after never giving up and gets the strip sack.
Off the top of my head guys like Ed Reed, Troy P, Clay Matthews, James Harrison.
If Mayo reaches that level of play making, this team will be in very good shape.
| 35 | 4K |
| 5 | 763 |
| 15 | 1K |
| 22 | 1K |
| 14 | 3K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 3 - April 18 (Through 26yrs)











