Kontradiction
On my retirement tour.
PatsFans.com Supporter
2020 Weekly Picks Winner
2021 Weekly Picks Winner
2023 Weekly Picks Winner
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2006
- Messages
- 68,279
- Reaction score
- 76,724
Actually no.
The problem with the "doubters" is the inconsistent, clueless nature of the your arguements.
Our defense sucks...... OK.... well who exactly is "good"? San Diego? Indianapolis? Baltimore? New Orleans? Minnesota? The jets have the best raqnked defense. i guess we can't beat them.
Our offense sucks because Brady locks in on Moss and Welker.... except now all is lost because Brady no longer has his binky in Welker... which was causing the offense to suck in the first place and they didn't play "2004" offensive football but now they can't win because they have to go back to "2004" football.
If your going to critique, shock us with some insight. Stop meeting our expectations.
Why do you keep including "me", a Patsfan with over 8,000 posts, in your post? What defenses are good? Let's see: Pittsburgh (with Polamalu), Jets, Dallas, Philly, Washington, Green Bay, Minnesota, San Fran, and just about every other defense that can actually get to the quarterback consistently. The majority of the teams that I just named can do it with three or four guys. We can rarely do it with seven. And yes, it is a FACT that whenever someone says glowing things about the Pats, they are spot on and, whenever they don't, they are idiots. For examples of this, look at a Peter King article whenever it's posted. The same people that call him an idiot whenever he says negative things about the Pats say that he's spot on when he says glowing things about them. If you can't see this, I can't help you.












