- Joined
- Jan 19, 2009
- Messages
- 16,414
- Reaction score
- 21,911
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I do. Do you really expect a team thats up 49-0 at the half to score just as many points in the 2nd half? How about 24-7? Theres no need to go out and beat teams by 60 points. You score enough to put the game away, and then you kill the clock.
May be Bill should have one plan for first half and another plan for second half for our "O" and "D".
Zolak revealed on his radio show last week that not much is done at half time. It's a total of 12 mins long, 4-5 of those minutes are spent getting into the locker room and back out, and then 3-4 minutes of stretching before 3rd quarter kickoff. The coaches basically say a short speech with very high level points, and then it's time to get back into the game.
The 1st half dominance stats show how well we scout and game plan, but once teams adjust to what we are doing, it is pretty much an even game from the 3rd quarter onwards. My bet would be that the Pats coordinators aren't changing the play calls that worked for them, thinking the original game plan will still work.
I would hope the coaches are doing more than this. This is fine for players (like Zolak) but coaches have a bit of time to discuss what they are seeing together that they don't get on the sidelines when they're a lot more occupied. Its a checkpoint. They came up with a gameplan and after 30 minutes of football they have a good sample to evaluate. Actually, I would think someone like BB would have a gameplan for both halves. Something like, here's how we approach the first half and here's how we approach the second half. But at halftime I'd still like to think they are evaluating what they saw in the first half.
I would hope the coaches are doing more than this. This is fine for players (like Zolak) but coaches have a bit of time to discuss what they are seeing together that they don't get on the sidelines when they're a lot more occupied. Its a checkpoint. They came up with a gameplan and after 30 minutes of football they have a good sample to evaluate. Actually, I would think someone like BB would have a gameplan for both halves. Something like, here's how we approach the first half and here's how we approach the second half. But at halftime I'd still like to think they are evaluating what they saw in the first half.
Agreed. Naturally adjustments can and should be ongoing, but a 12 minute break during a game is, really, kind of a lot. I don't think Belichick is doing much stretching in the locker room at half time.
I do. Do you really expect a team thats up 49-0 at the half to score just as many points in the 2nd half? How about 24-7? Theres no need to go out and beat teams by 60 points. You score enough to put the game away, and then you kill the clock.
NO NO NO NO NO, and NO. You do not just "score enough to put the game away". You should be trying to score EVERY possession. The only time you don't is if you can kneel on the ball to end the game.
When you get a lead, you should think about building it bigger. The first priority on offense is to call the plays that give you the best chance to SCORE. The SECOND priority is then to try to take as much time as possible.
Some people tend to forget this, but if we are calling plays that aren't very successful "in the name of killing the clock", we won't be "killing" the clock because we will end up 3 and out. It's far better to stick to a balanced attack and settling for 7 points in 2 minutes rather than spend 5 minutes getting 0 points, or worse, not burning any time AND not getting any points.
I'm just getting sick of people saying "just kill the clock". No, you keep playing until there is no clock. The Indy game is a great example of "running the clock" backfiring.
Yes, and the Patriots dont have the personell to "kill clock" right now. We dont have that running back that can keep grinding out first downs. Also, thats tough to do when you are missing 2 of your starting offensive linemen. I think that we could do this when Taylor and Morris come back and Neal and Light. It would be nice to see a 80 yard, 8+ minute drive, ending with a TD.
I would have liked to see the Pats be a little more aggressive yesterday. We didnt take any chances down the field in the 2nd half yesterday, even with Revis on Moss still take a chance and throw the ball down the field to keep the safties honest. This will help the running game. Our WR's seemed like they werent running any routes more than 10 yards in the 2nd half.
It almost seems like Bill's worst coaching job yet IMO.
This is such a talented team, there's no reason this team shouldn't be unbeaten right now. They've been ahead in every game and coughed it up 3 times. This team just needs to get its swagger back. It's like once they establish a big lead both the offense and defense fall asleep.
the defense goes soft, the OL forgets how to pass/run block. It never fails. Every loss, it's the same **** hurting the team. It seems like opponents just figure the Pats out come halftime. It's not a defensive problem, it's a team problem. They need to do better at coaching. They're blowing leads bby calling conservative defenses, repetitive offense, etc.
I hate to sound like just another complainer but enough is enough. W's like yesterday don't excite me after a loss like that at the Colts for what ever reason. I want to see this team monday night either handle a defensive battle or protect the goddamn lead for once.
The Patriots just seem to have the making of a finesse team. Very fast, quick to take the lead, and easy to give it up. The defense needs to be more aggressive and the OL needs to know how to hog down and move the chains in the final minutes.
This team used to do that, they just don't now. It's that simple. I love this team, but we have become the Oklahoma Sooners of the NFL, the early 2000's Colts. Until they win a big game in a tough situation, that's just what it is. No body said this team sucks, they just need a set of nuts.
It's a concern when the team that has done it to us twice now in the past 3 seasons is the one we'll most likely have to beat in the playoffs. Winning that game would have been huge, we'd be one game out of the first seed with a tie breaker. Instead we lose and we have these lingering questions. I don't think it's complaining but it is a cause for some concern going forward. Hopefully we stomp the crap out of NO this Monday and remove any lingering doubts about our teams ability to close out a good team.
I really really miss Taylor. We need him and Morris ready to go for December.
Agreed. Maroney makes me nervous when he touches the ball now.
Btw, where have the TE's gone in this pass game?? The O line has done a nice job this year. Why are the TE's not being included in this O as legit threats in the pass game?? It's Moss and Welker and Welker and Moss with an all too infrequent screen thrown in.
TOO PREDICTABLE!!!!
Might be why this offense is stalling in the 2nd half of games. It's ridiculous how vanilla this offense has become with all the weapons and plays they have .......but don't use.
| 73 | 5K |
| 5 | 1K |
| 10 | 762 |
| 10 | 766 |
| 17 | 803 |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 6 - April 21 (Through 26yrs)










