I think people are entitled to a second chance if 1) they've fulfilled their debt to society, which Vick soon will do; and 2) they demonstrate contrition.
The jury's still out on #2.
Of course the PETA wingnuts think he's a Ted Bundy who needs a
Brain Scan. Come again? But they also think KFC is perpetuating a "holocaust," which is a grotesquely stupid allegation.
We eat meat and wear leather, PETA be dog-derned. Animal rights activists lower human rights, which some posters here unconsciously have engaged in by saying what Vick did was only incrementally less worse than Rae Carruth's murdering, which has landed him in jail for life, as opposed to 23 months.
Give my a break. Murder of human beings is infinitely worse, worse even than the evil torture of animals, which I've read happens at slaughter houses in Matthew Scully's book _Dominion_. You know, where we get our cellophane-covered steak and hamburger.
Sometimes I think I should become a vegetarian for ethical and moral reasons.
Not all people who treat animals well are good--Hitler and the NAZIs were big animal rights activists and lovers--but all who mistreat animals are bad. I learned that from Dennis Prager.
People don't make enough of Vick's spreading a life-long STD in an unconscionable way to an unsuspecting girlfriend.
That said, people are too quick to dismiss what Vick could bring to this football team if he's truly reformed in his character. Put him at H-back or RB in the redzone. See what happens.
As former KC head coach Herm Edwards has said on ESPN, "There's something in the water up there [New England]." He said we can take players with checkered pasts, like current draft pick Brandon Tate, whom I can assure you is no boy scout, and reform them.
Just realize what a poor character guy Artrell Hawkins is in reality. I like RayClays input on
http://www.patsfans.com/new-england...ested-dui-ohio-page2.html#post560829RayClay's.
Why would it be any different with Vick? Spending nearly two years in jail, seeing his fortune and good name (except in some quarters) vanish, has got to change a man. Hopefully for the better for his case.
But we should be leery. But not close-minded at the prospect of Vick running back kickoffs or running the ball for us.
Total freakin' nightmare for the opposing defenses. They would have to play the pass simultaneously to the run, which Vick is an extraordinarily talented athlete to successfully bring about.
Here's a very intelligent NYT blog entry on the topic:
What Does Vick Have to Do to Satisfy You? - The Fifth Down Blog - NYTimes.com