Wow. I strongly disagree with the idea the top three are rookie starters. Mack's probably not a better guard than Neal...he has a better chance of starting at C. In fact, the only player on your board I can see as a starter (besides P) is Moore, and that certainly wouldn't be on Opening Day.
Not a bad draft, but I find you lack of faith disturbing.
Lack of faith? This not about trust, this is about the dynamics of football.
I didn't say any of these guys would start week one the way that Mayo or Mankins did... although that would be a nice surprise. BB tends to bring his rookies on slowly when he can. Meriweather was a rookie starter, although he didn't start till something like Week 12.
But I do believe these guys will start as rookies, otherwise I wouldn't draft them as high as I did. I painfully remember Bobby Grier defending his pick of Chris Canty with the words "I drafted him to be a nickleback for us". wtf? you drafted a guy to play nickleback in the first round?!? No f-ing way. First and early Second rounders need to project as starters for the team, otherwise you really should trade down. Find your nicklebacks and your roster trash in the 4th round and save your top picks for players that are going to play.
Laurinaitis only has Bruschi and Guyton ahead of him. Guyton is more of a warm body than a cornerstone, in my estimation, and Bruschi is playing as a pale shadow of himself. Laurinaitis is a Bruschi-tweaked hammy away from stepping in for good. Over a full season, I have no doubt that Laurinaitis would slip into the spot next to Mayo.
The other guy I spent a lot of thinking about in the first round is Darius Butler. I'm willing to bet he's going to be among the best DBs in the NFL before he retires, but I think he's a really long shot to start as a rookie with Springs, Bodden, Wilhite and Wheatley as his competition. So, I chose towards the roster value at ILB.
I drafted Mack to play C for us in the future, but we've got a pretty good C right now. The real weakness on the roster is at RG where Neal has a hard time playing 16 games, and that's where I think Mack would make his immediate impact on the roster. As for the idea that an elite C cant play at G... all I can say is "huh?" I could see how a G playing at C might struggle with the shotgun snap and line calls, if they're not used to doing that... but playing an elite C at G is a luxury move.
And English has Tully Banta Cain and Pierre Woods ahead of him. He's bigger and stronger than either of them, and once he has the system under him, he's going to be a 3-down force and certainly a strong option on first and second down.
Where's the lack of faith? This seems like a fairly reasonable assessment.