Well seeing how NONE of us know anybody that we see or or shwon or TV I guess its LOGICAL that you would judge somebody off of their Actions, their demeanor, how they carry themselves and from Public perceptions. I never knew hitler but I can safely say he wasn't a great person, I never Met Mother Teresea either but I can say she was a pretty good person based off of the available evidence
You say Dungy's image isn't consitent with the "truth" So what exactly is your truth? because here in reality Dungy hasn't given, shown, written said, or acted in any way to make me say that he is not a person that should looked up to and followed as a role model, that he is not the person he claims to be, but since you have this 'truth' that I don't, I'm sure you can give me some CONCRETE reasons that you have observed that would make you believe he doesn't live a life consitent with the way he carries himself around his players, the media, the respect he has from his peers, the respect he has for the game, the respect he has from his players and the stories from the many people close to him, that don't speak of this "truth" that you are referring to?
Or maybe it's just that the truth is maybe Dungy is the person he claims to be, the person he acts like, talks like, and walks like, that maybe this "truth" you speak of is really just your Colts bias wanting him to be something other than what every thing points to him being....???
I think you have a reading comprehension problem.
I have said absolutely nothing negative and not drawn a single conclusion about Dungy.
That was the responssiblity on your end of the argument.
My end of the argument (started by Keegs, not me) was IMAGE and RHETORIC aside, what indicates Tony Dungy is a 'great guy'?
You have just misread my comments (which were QUESTIONS) to say that I have drawn a conclusion and held me to the fire to give you reasons.
The fact is that I drew no conclusion, and the point of this thread was if you have drawn a conclusion give reasons why.
Ironically, by misreading my posts (where I am saying IS HE....? but you interpret HE IS.....) you have isolated why you are losing this argument.
THE ONLY ONE OF US, you, Keegs, or I who have drawn a conclusion is you. Now you are asking me to give concrete reasons to support an opinion I have not made. However, you have been asked for 10 pages to give reason to support an opinion you are strongly making, but have not.
Let me put this another way.
You believe Dungy is a great guy.
I do not know. Please convince me.
The reason I do not know is that I do not accept the rhetorical reasons that are his image.
-"Religous" is neither a postive or negative to me, because calling yourself religous and acting in the way that implies is about a 50/50 shot
-"Doesnt yell" is neither positive or negative to me
-"Never swears" is neither positive or negative to me.
I'm just asking, since you seem so adamant that Dungy is a great guy to give me some reasons to agree with you. These would be real reasons, steeped in his actions, as well as things that are clearly positive.
I never thought this would be so difficult