- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 22,930
- Reaction score
- 1,878
PATSNUTme said:Please tell us how you would get Branch back? Give him the $40mil contract, with the big signing bonus?
No, I assume both sides would save face by compromising.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.PATSNUTme said:Please tell us how you would get Branch back? Give him the $40mil contract, with the big signing bonus?
Patters said:I think I'm one of the few who has not posted a Deion Branch thread, so didn't want to be left out of the fun.
If BB is the man we think he is, he's going to soon make a decision whether to cave to Branch. In theory, BB is only concerned with winning football games. While the business of football might be important, winning is what he's hired to do. That's his first priority. I don't think BB will let pride get in his way if he thinks the team needs to have Branch back. Based on the first game, Branch's value has gone up, and BB knows it. If there must be a choice, I'd rather see the team win games, than beat Branch and Chayut.
MoLewisrocks said:That not just win but dominate BS sounds like something NEM would say. Belioli are operating this franchise not to win every superbowl for the next few seasons but to remain competitive enough to compete to win the superbowl for the next 10+ seasons.
We've won football games without Deion Branch on at least a dozen occasions in the past, including yesterday. There are just a handful of players on this team without whom we are hard pressed to win. Each of them took a little less to come or remain here. They represent the core of the team. You do not overpay for a WR who is not core material for that very reason.
After Seattle's poor offensive showing against the mighty Deroit Lions, they may now be more interested in Branchmgcolby said:Chris Mortenson on yesterday's pre-game show stated that he expects the Pats to start trying to move Branch today. So hopefully he ends up in Seattle or something and we get First rounder for him and maybe a player or a mid-round pick.
We already put money on Gabriel/Jackson. We would have to ADD money to add Branch. We would have to pay Branch about three or four times as much as Gabriel/jackson combined. Is Branch going to open it up three orfour times as much as Gabriel/Jackson combined?Garbanza said:Hmmm....so Branch WOULD open the offense more and Gabriel/Jackson MIGHT open it up. So, where do you put YOUR money?
Clonamery said:This is truth......a winning formula based on future returns versus momentary gains.
Are you kidding? BB long ago made that decision: he won't cave in, and it has nothing to do with personal pride. The only question has been whether Branch will cave in. I believe BB has already proven that his system works best in the long haul. Heck with that, when he let Terry Glenn go in 2001, he proved it can work best in the here and now.Patters said:I think I'm one of the few who has not posted a Deion Branch thread, so didn't want to be left out of the fun.
If BB is the man we think he is, he's going to soon make a decision whether to cave to Branch. In theory, BB is only concerned with winning football games. While the business of football might be important, winning is what he's hired to do. That's his first priority. I don't think BB will let pride get in his way if he thinks the team needs to have Branch back. Based on the first game, Branch's value has gone up, and BB knows it. If there must be a choice, I'd rather see the team win games, than beat Branch and Chayut.
Patters said:You must have both to be a good team.
Clonamery said:But one way stays with you year in year out and the other disappears like a fart in the wind or like the Jets (whichever example you prefer).