Just how valuable is a great LT to a winning football team? I ask this looking at the career of the Browns’ Joe Thomas who will be inducted this summer as a first ballot pro football HOFer. Lauded as one of the best at his position to ever play the game, the Browns only finished over 500 once in his 11year career averaging only 4 wins a season.
It’s hard to imagine a team having an historically great player at QB, WR, TE, CB or edge rusher only averaging 4 wins a season no matter how inept the rest of the team might be.
The last 3 SB champs lined up Orlando Brown, Andrew Whitworth and Donovan Smith at LT. None of whom will ever be lauded as one of the best ever.
What I’m thinking is while good offensive line play is essential to winning football it’s the quality and depth of the unit having a greater impact than having a red chip player at one of the positions. What I’m also thinking is with so much shotgun being run and so little deep drop pass plays, the interior line play might now be as important if not more important than the tackles.
I think the Patriots can win as many games over the next 5 with Tyler Steen playing LT as Broderick Thomas. But, they’ll win more games if they use their 1st rounder on a red chip boundary corner or tight end than a LT.
Good topic but oversimplified math.
LT is one of the most valuable assets on the team for a reason. The fact that top LTs are usually on bad teams only underlines it. There are only so many of them in a decade, they are drafted by bad teams, they dont see FA and trade cost is just insane.
I think your question has a flawed premise. Every QB, OC and prob even HC would love to have great LT. But great/winning teams have difficulty to afford it since what makes them a winning team is probably having top $ already tied to multiple other positions and mostly have QB on top $ as well.
The other problem is that LT is a part of the biggest UNIT in football. Like you said team needs at least 6-7 solid NFL starters on OL in order to properly function in Jan/Feb. So yes, one great LT is not going to make a difference on a sub average OL, but it can transform a solid OL to a dominant one sooner than anybody else. We've seen this in NE the first year Mount Brown came here.
The fact is the two top teams - KC & PHI - have both dominant OLs & have heavily invested in OL both in FA and Draft. That includes LT. And thats despite having two top paid QBs. The last time KC was not a winning team was when they were left wo starting LT (and RT) and had no valid replacement.
The real question here before FA was - how valuable is a good or even solid LT to a rebuilding team with young 1st round QB.
BBs answer was pretty much negative. They were in on Dillard and that was it it seems. Maybe he didn't like the top guys, maybe he didn't like the value, who knows. I think counting on either Brown or 2023 Draft is a mistake (and BBs rebuilding through FA has so many of them over last 3 yrs). Of course if Brown stays healthy and plays like 2018 in his contract year - all big IFs - it can still work out ok for this yr - but the future at LT remains huge ? and this is unfortunately not the Draft to bank on it.