- Joined
- Jun 12, 2006
- Messages
- 5,456
- Reaction score
- 724
maybe it's just me, but i simply didnt like him because of the 'get paid' attitude. was he good? sure. is he wrong for wanting the money? not at all. he just reminded me of ty "feed my family" law. its just an attitude thing.
i prefer guys like tom, tedy, faulk. they do their jobs, and don't ***** to the media about money. they "get paid" without all the publicity.
We can all choose who we "like" or cheer for but it is not 1955 anymore. Sports is a business. Samuel was an excellent player and now he is very well compensated. Here is a quote from Rodney Harrison on Boston.com.
http://www.boston.com/sports/football/patriots/reiss_pieces/2008/08/rodney_talks_as.html
It was then pointed out to Harrison that Samuel had been limited due to a hamstring injury, and Harrison was asked if Samuel might be following in the line of former Patriots players who signed elsewhere only to experience health problems and not produce as projected (such as Damien Woody, Deion Branch and David Givens).
Harrison bristled at the question.
“He’s a tremendous player and he’s going to be a tremendous player no matter what uniform he puts on,” he said. “It’s a story for [the media] to sit back and hate on him and wish that he does terrible because he didn’t sign here. But all in all, he’s a friend of ours, and we wish him the best. Business is business. Sometimes you can sign a guy and sometimes you can't. You don't worry about things you can't control.”
Last edited:











