- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 72,767
- Reaction score
- 22,603
Sure. The raw product hasn’t proven he can’t grow into his potential. The failure has failed.Is there really a difference between a raw product who hasn't progressed from that stage in 3 years and someone who isn't competent at the position?
In other words would you rather get a great athlete who hasn’t figured it out yet and has had minimal opportunity or the guy ahi played and proved he sucks.












