pheenix11
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2006
- Messages
- 5,151
- Reaction score
- 4,777
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Just in case BB needs to keep 18 TEs on the roster, he’ll have jersey #s for themMy son asked me a good question tonight, how come so many of the Pats receivers have low uniform numbers?
Edelman 11
Cooks 14
Hogan 15
Mitchell 19
Dorsett 13
Slater 18
Is there any particular reason?
My son asked me a good question tonight, how come so many of the Pats receivers have low uniform numbers?
Edelman 11
Cooks 14
Hogan 15
Mitchell 19
Dorsett 13
Slater 18
Is there any particular reason?
I wish someone would ask bb this question
I wish someone would ask bb this question
My son asked me a good question tonight, how come so many of the Pats receivers have low uniform numbers?
Edelman 11
Cooks 14
Hogan 15
Mitchell 19
Dorsett 13
Slater 18
Is there any particular reason?
I'm okay with whatever number they use, as long as the Patriots stop handing out the cursed #17 to any players.
Aaargh you beat me to it! I was going to make a Chad Jackson reference that only us old timers would get.
They have Britt wearing 85 currently though, don’t they?
I dream of a day where a team has enough WRs and TEs signed to take up all of the eligible teen and 80s numbers and a new addition gets to have an unusual number.Only because they were out of 1_ numbers.
I dream of a day where a team has enough WRs and TEs signed to take up all of the eligible teen and 80s numbers and a new addition gets to have an unusual number.