The_Dragon
Practice Squad Player
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2007
- Messages
- 143
- Reaction score
- 0
I believe in one of BB's press conferences, he did a mini-analysis of the 3-4 vs. 4-3, he considered the 3-4 a better run formation and the 4-3 a better pass formation. You've probably noted the Pats going to a 4-3 on passing downs, dropping the OLBs down as DEs and moving Sey inside with Green.
Putting my easy chair coach's hat on: the 4-3 was used against the Jets in the Meadowlands, the 3-4 in Gillette. The 4-3 would seem to do a better job of clogging throwing lanes with Vince at 6-2 having the shortest arms to bat down a pass - Warren and Sey at 6-6 are both good at that. Green at 6-3 is just a great penetrator to pressure the backfield. The disadvantage is it's harder to disguise who is rushing. If Penny is throwing short, then it makes sense to clog the throwing lanes and sacrifice some run yardage.
If Vince's ankle is still tender, this takes pressure off of him to hold the nose, he'll have Sey inside to help and have Wright for rest periods.
Thanks Box_O_Rocks. Obscuring Pennington's vision and clogging the lanes with the taller linemen for the short routes wasn't something I had thought of. Like all good ideas it's very simple.
I have noticed how Green comes in for the throwing situations - he ran riot when brought in against the Bengals earlier in the year with Palmer throwing the catch up.
The starting seven in a 4-3 would be Warren - Wilfork - Seymour - Green - Vrabel - Bruschi - Colvin I assume?
I'll try to get my hands on that BB press conference. Alternatively if anyone has it in their possesion I'd appreciate a copy.












