primetime
Pro Bowl Player
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2005
- Messages
- 13,627
- Reaction score
- 15,375
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Put James in the Game! he keeps the chains movin’I'm fine letting him develop, but in the meantime, White needs to be in either as RB or WR at least two downs every series.
He's a playmaker why we aren't using him much blows my mind.
the Pats pretty much have no choice but to run the ball with Sony.
I hope McDaniels is more creative in the formations that lead to Sony runs. It's been pretty obvious pre-snap, when Sony is going to run the ball. I want to see more runs out of the shotgun. I'm fine with the stretch run plays but I better not see one of those on third and one ever again.
Put Both James & Shiny in the game at the same time, in the same backfield with Develin, and with Gronk & Hogan at the edges. It's all we have now.Put James in the Game! he keeps the chains movin’
I'm not usually one to blame McDaniels because I think he's a fine coach, but I don't know how you expect a guy to succeed when you're that predictable.
He has played 36 snaps. Something isn’t predictable the first time you do it.
It’s very simple. When Sony Michel went into the game for the first time ANYTHING they did would be unpredictable. Having played only 36 snaps it is ridiculous to think that during those 36 it suddenly became predictable, considering it was in just 2 games. (By the way calling a pass than ends up being thrown to the rb is not “predictable”)He's played 39 snaps if you include the three nullified by penalty, and he's gotten the ball or been thrown it on 33 of them.
I don't pretend to know what world you live in where that's not predictable, but boy you never get tired of your shtick, do you?
It’s very simple. When Sony Michel went into the game for the first time ANYTHING they did would be unpredictable. Having played only 36 snaps it is ridiculous to think that during those 36 it suddenly became predictable, considering it was in just 2 games. (By the way calling a pass than ends up being thrown to the rb is not “predictable”)
You can’t give away a tendency when you are in the process of establishing the tendency.
Michel carried 7 times for 40 yards in the second half of last game. So I guess the lions didn’t catch on.I don't even know what you're saying here. He got the ball on 85% of the snaps he's played this year. Do you not understand how easy it is for a defense to go, huh, Sony's on the field, that means he's almost assuredly getting the ball? Do you not understand how easy it is to defend an offense that targets a player almost every single time he is on the field? Those passes were designed swing passes to Michel.
They obviously established a tendency in those two games that they were going to feed Sony every time he was in the game. It was wildly predictable, and the Jaguars and the Lions clearly caught on and took advantage of it. That's garbage coaching no matter how you slice it. Even you, even you, have to see that.
It may change going forward, but it's something to contextualize both the offense in those two games and Sony's struggles.
It's not that they run with him, it's that when he's on the field, the ball's going to him regardless of whether the playcall is a run or pass. It's hard to look at that and see a coaching staff that isn't forcing the issue, or worse, trying to justify picking a 1st round running back.
Might open up some nice play action if only our two lightning quick wideouts can get separation deep. If Gordon plays, the Patriots should be able to absolutely FEAST on PA off of Michel. No doubt the Dolphins have seen that on tape as well.
I hear that Patterson and Dorsett are really fast and athletic.Might open up some nice play action if only our two lightning quick wideouts can get separation deep. If Gordon plays, the Patriots should be able to absolutely FEAST on PA off of Michel. No doubt the Dolphins have seen that on tape as well.