Which one would you chose?

[true_patriot]

If Pats can have only one of these two; which one would you chose and why?

16-0

OR

Superbowl.

I can't make up my mind. To me Pats will always be the team of this decade. We are already a dynastic team. We already acheived many things, multiple SB, longest WIN streaks, post season streaks etc etc. But going 16-0 - even without a SB this season - will give Pats another level of immortality.
Don't you think?

 

[ctpatsfan77]

If Pats can have only one of these two; which one would you chose and why?

16-0

OR

Superbowl.

I can't make up my mind. To me Pats will always be the team of this decade. We are already a dynastic team. We already acheived many things, multiple SB, longest WIN streaks, post season streaks etc etc. But going 16-0 - even without a SB this season - will give Pats another level of immortality.
Don't you think?

Super Bowl. 16-0 + no Super Bowl = wasted season in my book.

 

[biffman]

Super Bowl. 16-0 + no Super Bowl = wasted season in my book.

Ditto that. It’s not even a close call. If you go 16-0 and lose in the playoffs, that’s a horrible disappointment. OTOH, if you win the Superbowl, who the hell cares what your record in the regular season was.

 

[miamipat]

Very easy-give me 8-8 and a Superbowl win any day over 16-0 and no superbowl.

 

[Mix]

The Super Bowl and its not even close IMO.

 

[Slagathor]

Can't I have both!!!!!?????

 

[makoute]

Can't I have both!!!!!?????

Yeah what's wrong with both. I think a team that goes 16-0 is a lock to win the Superbowl.

 

[jct]

You have to choose Superbowl here....

 

[mgteich]

not close at all; the Super Bowl

 

[DarrylS]

Without a doubt Superbowl..

 

[brady199]

If we went 16-0 and didn't win the SB, it wouldn't really add to our dynasty, we would be know as the team who couldn't finish.

Brady loosing the superbowl, are you crazy?

 

[reflexblue]

NO question SB.

 

[ddell1]

no brainer! another bowl is all that matters

 

[Flying Fungi]

 

[Fixit]

Easiest. Question. Ever.

It's all about the bling, baby.

 

[spacecrime]

Yeah what's wrong with both. I think a team that goes 16-0 is a lock to win the Superbowl.

Any given Sunday. The VIkes went 15-1 and didn't even make it to the superbowl, let alone win.

 

[spacecrime]

If Pats can have only one of these two; which one would you chose and why?

16-0

OR

Superbowl.

I can't make up my mind. To me Pats will always be the team of this decade. We are already a dynastic team. We already acheived many things, multiple SB, longest WIN streaks, post season streaks etc etc. But going 16-0 - even without a SB this season - will give Pats another level of immortality.
Don't you think?

Superbowl. What does 16-0 get you? Nothing. What immortality? It's not even an undefeated season - you have to finish out the playoffs to be undefeated a la 72 dolphins.

I cannot see anything good about going 16-0 and getting bumped out of the playoffs.

I guess you could be lumped in with the Bills as good teams that could finish the job. Hardly my idea of a legacy.

 

[brady199]

Any given Sunday. The VIkes went 15-1 and didn't even make it to the superbowl, let alone win.

Steelers too, how could you forget the steelers and remember the vikes?

 

[mojocaster.com]

Super Bowl. 16-0 + no Super Bowl = wasted season in my book.

Bingo. We got bingo.

 

[spacecrime]

Steelers too, how could you forget the steelers and remember the vikes?

It's hell getting old.