I'm just implying that in terms of organizational process, people should do more than just sit around acting sad, there is nothing wrong with engaging in rational dialog about logistics and what ifs, a process that loops in players/coaches. If they refuse to play then of course you can't force them to, but the consequences should be logically laid out rather than just "let's all feel sad and only think about the player". That's not how decisions should be made, you need people in charge to set aside feelings and think rationally even when it is hard. There are people literally paid to do this. A lot. There are more factors at play than just feelings here. What Skip Bayliss wrote was perfectly reasonable, a tiny slice of what the decision makers were absolutely having to worry about as reasonable people.
In terms of what I think they should have done (which obviously means jack squat) I would have tried to push to play the game if I was an owner or whatever. Also, my guess is if the coaches were Belichick and Reid, they would have finished the game. OTOH, my wife thought I was crazy when I said they should be professionals, finish the game, and rally for the dude who was hurt. But she's an NBA fan where each game is meaningless.