NFL GAME DAY DISCUSSION Week 16: Rams-Sea, Chi-GB, Buf-Cle, Jax-Den, Pitt-Det, 49ers-Colts

[Betterthanmost]

Game over and good night.

 

[UrbanCowboy]

well ... maybe not. Hawks still breathing. Amazing!

 

[PATSYLICIOUS]

Holy ****. That totally looks like this 2 pt conversion should count

 

[Delicate Genius]

Crazy.

 

[UrbanCowboy]

Sam working his magic on the 2 point conversion!

 

[Haterproof]

Wow

 

[NovaScotiaPatsFan]

That was by far the weirdest two-point conversion I've ever seen.

 

[Gumby]

Unfreakkbgbelievable sequence

 

[n1997y]

Stafford felt that hit

 

[PATSYLICIOUS]

Shouldn’t a 2 pt conversion be like a 4th down where only the fumbling player can advance the ball? It might not be the rule now but it should be, same logic in situations where youre falling short of the line to gain might as well just ‘ fumble’ it

 

[Haterproof]

The NFC West is going to be an epic iron cage match until the end

 

[upstater1]

You have 3rd down and that's your play? A WR screen?

Your QB is HOFer Matthew Stafford during an MVP year. Your head coach is Sean McVay.

And you're telling me McDaniels is getting heat?

McDaniels didn't call anything as stupid as that.

 

[NFL Mystique]

Puka's comments may end up costing them a SB. All the calls going against the Rams

 

[upstater1]

Shouldn’t a 2 pt conversion be like a 4th down where only the fumbling player can advance the ball? It might not be the rule now but it should be, same logic in situations where youre falling short of the line to gain might as well just ‘ fumble’ it

Depends on who knocked it "backward." If it was the Ram who knocked it back, then it was simply recovered.

 

[Gumby]

Stafford & Lambs watching our game last week: Hey, They gave up 21 pt lead in a half…..

„Hold our beer, we only have 8 minutes…“. LOL

 

[NovaScotiaPatsFan]

Depends on who knocked it "backward." If it was the Ram who knocked it back, then it was simply recovered.

Yeah, I believe it was batted by a Ram.

 

[NovaScotiaPatsFan]

 

[PATSYLICIOUS]

Depends on who knocked it "backward." If it was the Ram who knocked it back, then it was simply recovered.

In this situation there was no intent so im ok with it.

But say if a rb is trying to run in a 2 pt conversion and is stopped clearly short. He might as well just ‘fumble’ it into the end zone and hope a teammate recovers. Theres no downside to that on a 2 pt conversion, just like on 4th downs which i believe is why they have that rule for 4th downs.

Edit- i think i see what youre saying. If the defender knocked it loose the offense can recover. But if an offensive player just loses the ball they wouldn’t let them recover it. Is that how the rule works?

 

[PATSYLICIOUS]

Rams are winning top 36-22 and still might lose this game

 

[Guts]

Darnold is cheeks