It is interesting that first Mayo and now AVP have taken the approach of publicly accosting their players for their failed efforts. Whether this is "hard coaching" or "blaming the players for their own coaching failures" I guess is the question. I believe it is the former in AVP's case, the latter in Mayo's.
Mayo, I have noticed, has in recent weeks tended to blame the journalists for promoting the broad ill-perception of the team, dismissing the implications of their questions as "outside noise." This effectively puts him in in the position of on the one hand telling the players they are "soft" and that the team's failures are attributable to lousy execution rather than to lousy coaching, while at the same time contradictorally telling the players it's "us" - players and coaches - against the "haters" among the press and, by extension, the fans, as whose agents or intermediaries the press serves. He has thus put himself into a position where the press, the fans, and the press all have motivation to conceive a resentment and say, "Screw you, you're the one who is "leading" a crap team without an effective culture."
AVP's public criticism is not part of a general policy of blame-shifting. Mayo's is.
The job was handed to Mayo for reasons which in my mind have nothing whatever to do with his competency for the job. His boss found him a charming travel companion. He's a "nice guy." Thinking of his "career in business," I suspect that Mayo's present position may not be the first time he was handed a job for which he was not qualified. Apparently, he assumed that when he was handed the job he would also be handled success in that job. It can't work that way in a genuinely competitive context such as pro football. His failure is obvious, and I suspect neither fans, nor players, nor press will be willing for very much longer to pretend otherwise.
The Pats, as in my mind the nation must do as well, must return to merit as the sole criterion for building a management team. The "hiring process" by which the entire present leadership team was hired was so slipshod, with predictable results, that this means they must start over. This is, I realize, a painful matter in a number of ways, but these are not the sorts of problems which will be solved by "waiting it out and hoping for the best," as some in the press - Breer certainly and to a degree Curran - are presently asserting. This problem requires an honest if painful evaluation and a solution to match..