Dorsett was double-covered on that route and that certainly wasn't Brady's best effort or judgment.
But that still ducks the question, "what percentage of Dorsett's routes have been deep compared to Cooks? And what percentage have been more like Amendola's typical routes?" The point being that, if they have Dorsett running mostly Amendola-type routes, then clearly the Pats are NOT "relying on him to be Cooks' replacement."
Who else was open underneath on that throw? Go back and look. Nothing. The choice is to let it loose after that and shake up the under coverage, as I mentioned to luuked in the last post. Give your guy a chance to go up and get it and if he doesn't, the hope is to loosen up the defense and make them align another safety deep.
He's been running Amendola routes regularly? Seems to me that he's been running mostly RB-type routes, and running them well enough to get open.
He's been running mostly routes 1-4 in the route tree from what I've observed. That's what I said prior to the season as well. Reason being is because his route running has always been suspect at best. So this observation from you plays into my point that he can't be trusted to run more routes and needs to be limited. That begs the question of why you think he's getting open. The defense also knows this from film study and can simply squat on those routes. So why is Tom freezing him out? Is it because he's mean? Or is it because he doesn't trust Patterson and hasn't trusted him since TC and knows that if Patterson can't be where Brady needs him to be, the chances of an INT go up?
Before missing three games for the Browns last season with a knee issue, Britt missed only one game in his three years with the Rams, and it wasn't due to injury. Yes, he had relatively frequent injury issues back when he was still with the Titans (six years ago now), but at some point, those issues lose their predictive value wrt future injuries when there's been an extended period without significant injury.
He came to the Patriots already dealing with a knee issue and missed two games in 2017 with a groin injury. He was then banged up in camp. Given all that plus prior injury history plus age, the Patriots should have (rightly) known that Britt would not be the answer and chosen to do more at the position to bolster it. Not only did they have FA and trades, they also had the draft at their disposal. And yet they chose to rely on a guy that had just missed all of last season and has a history of
chronic knee issues and a guy that's deemed a high injury risk on the wrong side of 30. And this was supposed to make me feel better about them doing all they could (supposedly) at the position... how?
The Pats currently have $3.55M in cap space. If we pretend that Britt and Matthews (and Gordon) had never happened, that erases Gordon's $700k and $575k in dead money (all except Mitchell). That brings the Pats up to $4.8M in cap space. So, how would they have been able to afford any of the contracts signed by the players you've listed? What - specifically - could they have done (or not done) to have had enough (or ANY) cap space at this point after having agreed to one of those contracts?
Brown's contract (a 1 year deal) is right up the Patriots' alley and would be an improvement upon whoever they currently have at the position now. Furthermore, you act as if the draft doesn't exist and you also act like the Patriots don't have a history of restructuring contracts to increase cap space.
Complacent? Britt wasn't injured until the end of June. Who could they have signed after that? Maybe they kept their hopes that Mitchell would recover alive too long, but they still had a healthy Matthews for the first week of Camp. Who was available to acquire after that (who was affordable)?
The problem is relying on Britt after he missed games last season and was on the wrong side of 30 and relying on Mitchell. They should not have done that. So yes, they were complacent.
Yup. If either of Britt or Matthews is healthy, there's no need for Gordon and we're not having this discussion.
Or if the team had chosen to do more at the position when it had the chance to do so, there would be no need for Gordon. The fact is that they didn't. They went the cheap route and made some curious decisions in the draft and it came back to bite them. Now they're 1-2 with the tape showing WRs who are having trouble separating from man which led them to take a shot on a guy that's one more strike from a lifetime ban that they would have never touched with a 10 foot pole otherwise.
It was never about "bargain hunting". It was about taking their best shot with the caps space they knew they'd have available to spend.
It was absolutely about bargain hunting. Again, they also had the draft at their disposal as well.
The Pats WR corps "as it's currently constructed" had only THREE viable members before Gordon was acquired (and we don't yet know if Gordon is actually viable). Yeah, I think that's worse than WR corps that have four or five viable members - especially when the receiving TE misses 2 of 3 games, the #1RB tears an ACL in the first game, and the rookie draft pick can't catch a pass to save his life.
And those viable members are a guy with all the speed in the world that can't get open near the sticks or on deeper routes, a guy with a limited route tree because his route running leaves a lot to be desired, and a guy who is at best a #3 playing as a #1. Out... standing. The result is that the team is now 1-2, statistically one of the worst teams in the league (for now... I expect that to change), and is in a must-win game in Week 4.
Again ... either Britt or Matthews ... no problem. Life is what happens while you're making other plans. I really don't see any realistic woulda-coulda-shoulda on BB's part that would have made a significant difference.
I'm not blaming the team for Matthews. That's just simply bad luck. It is what it is. But where are you getting "Britt... no problem" from? What did he, and over 30 year old WR with a history of injuries and locker room problems, do in his two catches and 23 yards gained in 2017 that inspires that kind of confidence?