Metaphors
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2005
- Messages
- 3,670
- Reaction score
- 0
As I recall, Dan Klecko was a 4th round pick, at the Combine he stood just under 6' and weighed 283. Risking a 6th rounder on the taller, lighter Klug doesn't quite seem the same to me.
The Klecko comparison was meant to be a compliment. High-effort, football smart, coachable, productive, position misfit.
You have hit on my main point though. The round you take someone only matters in the context of the rest of your draft picks (and other signings). Bair in the 6th is a better value than A.Smith in the 1st or Sheard in the 2nd only if your team is better at the end of the day. I realize that is an amazingly obvious statement, but it is necessary for coming up with a viable draft plan.
I consider an outside pass rush (end or LB) to be the overriding consideration in this draft. If the Pats keep passing on this because the perfect "value" isn't there and then end up with only Bair and/or Klug to show for their efforts, the rest of the draft won't matter. You didn't explicitly say this was your plan, but your comments were generally negative until you hit Bair and Klug.
The Pats need to address the pass rush and the OL future (or possibly even present). Ever other aspect of the team is good enough (when healthy) to win a championship next year and compete for one in the foreseeable future. For this draft, time to go big or don't bother.











