Trade up to as high as #10?

[PATSNUTme]

I'm waiting.

It was my New Years resolution. You know how those things go.

 

[convertedpatsfan]

I'm not opposed to trading up, but not for Jones or Quinn. Jones isn't really a need and Quinn has too many question marks.

Still undecided about Smith.

 

[3rd and Long]

Quinn would be my #1 guy to target if we move up, he is going to be a monster. The problem is he may not be there at 10. We got to hope both QBs go early and push the stud defenders down the board where we can realistically trade up to.

 

[jsull87]

Quinn would be my #1 guy to target if we move up, he is going to be a monster. The problem is he may not be there at 10. We got to hope both QBs go early and push the stud defenders down the board where we can realistically trade up to.

yeah i'm really hoping for a run on the QB's just because there is such a need from alot of the teams ahead of us.

i am wanting Gabbert, Mallet, Lockyer and Newton to be off the board before our pick.

My ideal scenario is those 4 to say arizona,buffalo, cincy and washington.

Ingram, Jones and Green going before us as well.

Effectively leaving us in reach of those coveted defensive players we want. Here's hoping an OT or 2 gets mixed in there as well getting us even closer to the. Dareus, Quinn, Peterson, bowers, smith, watt, amakamura e.t.c of this draft

 

[Off The Grid]

If Smith and Watt are available at 10, I'd do something like 17 and 60 for #11 and 28 and 33 for #10 to get them both.

[ignoring Condon concerns, of course]


As for Bowers, he's an elephant OLB prospect, and I'll take the all-around OLB over the elephant.

Ah!! This is actually the first time I've seen this addressed directly, though I'm sure there've been many instances I've missed...

And I agree 100%: It's fun to speculate about Willie Mac II, but it's also absolutely unnecessary: Give me a World Class Flanker ~ as Aldon Smith threatens to be ~ or TWO...and I don't give a damn IF they can line up at End in our Sub Packs!!