- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 72,682
- Reaction score
- 22,511
They chose to pocket 43 million when those 70 players i listed were available. They are a better team with smith and Ridley.Smith is a fossil, he won't make it through an entire season. He used to be good though...
Ridley is overpriced, he got outplayed by Christian Kirk on his own team last season before Kirk got hurt. His contract is stupid.
Pollard couldn't make it as the RB1 for Dallas, he's an undersized scatback. I'd rather have Gibson as long as he's not putting the ball on the ground.
This is the problem with your take, there were no impact players at the positions of need for the Patriots. I'd agree with you if Tristen Wirfs or Christian Darrisaw were free agents and the Pat's didn't take a shot at acquiring them, but they weren't.
The free agent class at OT and WR were mostly overrated garbage. The Pats have a few WR's already who might turn out better than Ridley. The stud free agent tackle wasn't available, he simply wasn't there. There were guys I wanted over Okorafor for certain, but they were similarly priced free agents... spending more wouldn't have been necessary.
If you are telling me Gibson is better than pollard let’s just stop there because I have no interest in any opinion you have about football if you believe that. And by the way pollard rushed for 1000 yards each of the last 2 seasons and averages 4.8/carry for his career.











