We all know the science in the Wells Report is bunk, which means the text messages are the basis of the "more probable than not" determination.
Looking at the text messages, the only words that seem potentially damning are McNally referring to himself as the "deflator" and joking about "not going to espn". Wells himself pinpointed those texts twice in his conference call yesterday. I think it's fair to say that he based his conclusions on those texts and those text alone.
So the logical next step is to ask McNally the question - what do those texts mean? Why do you call yourself the "deflator"?
The answer to those questions hold the key to this entire f'ing debacle. I honestly wish McNally had taken that 2nd interview with Wells. That'd clear up everything. Hopefully they get to the bottom of that in the upcoming appeal and/or lawsuit.
EDIT: I only want this question answered because I think if McNally produced a reasonable answer to it, it'd absolve himself, Jastremski, and Brady of EVERYTHING claimed.
Looking at the text messages, the only words that seem potentially damning are McNally referring to himself as the "deflator" and joking about "not going to espn". Wells himself pinpointed those texts twice in his conference call yesterday. I think it's fair to say that he based his conclusions on those texts and those text alone.
So the logical next step is to ask McNally the question - what do those texts mean? Why do you call yourself the "deflator"?
The answer to those questions hold the key to this entire f'ing debacle. I honestly wish McNally had taken that 2nd interview with Wells. That'd clear up everything. Hopefully they get to the bottom of that in the upcoming appeal and/or lawsuit.
EDIT: I only want this question answered because I think if McNally produced a reasonable answer to it, it'd absolve himself, Jastremski, and Brady of EVERYTHING claimed.
Last edited: