Triumph
PatsFans.com Retired Jersey Club
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2004
- Messages
- 30,019
- Reaction score
- 23,292
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Interception...40 seconds left...Jets ZERO TO's...GAME OVER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!....not ONE reason why Mangold should do ANYTHING..yet YOU are going to argue what YOU SEE with your own two eyes??? I was THERE...in REAL TIME...everyone saw what he did and everyone KNOWS what a piece of shyt he is. ...PERIOD
yeah judge...I only meant to shoot him in the leg but he BENT DOWN...not my fault I shot him ion the head..
ridiculous rationalization...THAT was dirty...period...no argument...you want to continue then have a good night you're obviously trolling
Jags and Raiders. Pats are lucky they played the Bills and Jets first and did not start with the Falcons/Bengals/Saints as their first three games.
Considering the Jets kept fielding their punt team with NO return man, those numbers are not that shocking to me.
As to why they kept doing that, a quick google revealed "With the Leonhard injury the Jets will need to find a punt return man." I'm not sure if that was the real reason or not, but it seems bizarre to not put someone out there unless they saw something on film that made them believe they could block our punts.
Talib was NOT out of bounds when Mangold left his feet.
Yawn, same excuse for BJGE in 08. He showed something in that 1 game Ridley doesn't have, explosion.
It's not a "fact" he's not good. BB disagrees. He's a 2nd year RB he kept despite nagging injuries and a suspension. There's a reason for that. It's to pressure the slow buffoon who's averaged 3.8ypc since last year midseason.
When Ridley isn't gashing the Titans week 1 or the Rams in London, he's mediocre and hurts this team.
The Ridley defenders are approaching Maroney level.
And Mangold was definitely not going for his thighs while Talib was moving out of the bounds with the game no longer in question.
Are you done calling people stupid Bruinz? Cannot believe that you and I are in Briz's league.
Anybody good at photoshop?
Can you make a Muhammad Wilkerson "were going to be 2 - 1" pic?
Just because you are too much of a homer to believe reality doesn't mean the rest of us are. You really should go and get those eyes checked because it was clear that Mangold did NOT intend to injure Talib. Talib was still IN BOUNDS when Mangold started his tackle (and yes, he was above Talib's knees when he started).
The replay shots prove that.
As for being in that league, this is the 10th year he's run it. I've been in since it's inception. Making stupid comments like you are doing only reflects poorly on you.
Just because you are too much of a homer to believe reality doesn't mean the rest of us are. You really should go and get those eyes checked because it was clear that Mangold did NOT intend to injure Talib. Talib was still IN BOUNDS when Mangold started his tackle (and yes, he was above Talib's knees when he started).
The replay shots prove that.
As for being in that league, this is the 10th year he's run it. I've been in since it's inception. Making stupid comments like you are doing only reflects poorly on you.
You know Bruinz - I don't know what happened to you from the time you were at ESPN, but you clearly are not the same poster over there as you are here.
There is a poll on the league page regarding the hit on Talib. My guess is that they will see the same thing that I saw last night.
Have a nice day Bruinz.
So you are saying Bill Belichick, the guy right there on the sideline, was wrong in thinking it was a dirty hit and calling him out for it?
Talib was still IN BOUNDS when Mangold started his tackle (and yes, he was above Talib's knees when he started).
Rookies.....it was dobsons first game.....these guys need reps
It will come together.....Dobson and thompkins can get open.....
Could you please post the link where Belichick said it was a dirty hit? Did you ever stop to think that Belichick was getting on Mangold because he felt that Mangold didn't need to try and tackle Talib, but just needed to push him OOB?
Do yourself a favor and just go with what I said. Not what you erroneously think I said. Not what you have no proof of Belichick saying.
Oh, and one last thing. How do you know that Belichick wasn't livid at Talib for not going down right away and putting himself in a bad position to possibly get injured?
BTW, all we have is Mangold saying that Belichick got heated but that he didn't know what Belichick actually said.. At least in all the credible links I've been able to find..
I don't know how i fell going forward from this game. Our defense was not really tested against Buffalo and the Jets, so until Week 4 i won't make any calls. I know they are rookies but man there is a limit, god forbids that Julian gets hurt.