Here's the thing and it's not an overeaction:
We have the athletes on defense to be more aggressive. Our guys on defense plays BETTER when they are aggressive. Against the Bengals in the first half, we played aggressive, our corners played man and pressed them and we played fantastic. The Bengals have arguably a better offensive team that the Jets. We did let the Bengals score and pile up some yardage, but that was mainly because we started playing a soft zone. I guess the strategy became "hey, don't give up an easy TD, we have a huge lead". It's not just the Pats, but we've seen countless teams start playing prevent defense when they are ahead. It drives me and i'm sure countless numbers of fans. (This is one of the reason I respect Rex and his willingness to get after it even though the game is on the line). Fast forward to this game, we come out and play zone against the Jets offense. I'm thinking, "why give this offense so much respect when you played aggressive and took chances last week against a better Bengals offense?" We have the athletes to play aggressive, THEY PLAY BETTER WHEN THEY PRESS, and the soft zone gave Sanchez time to settle in and get in and get comfortable. I just don't undestand. BUT, it's something that I expected. We've seen this so many times. Against weak QBs, BB goes into a zone mode and explicably allows them to get into ryhtms. Henne, AJ Feely, Orton, just to name a few come to mind when thinking of mediocre QBs playing like All Pro's when they go up against our vaunted zone (Sarcasm).
My point is regarding our defense, it doesn't matter what happened in this game or how games unfold in the future. If BB is our HC, we will play to "not lose the game" and play those soft zones instead of taking chances and play "to win the game." This has been BB's M.O. ever since he's gotten here and it hasn't changed. The only difference then was that Brady and our offense before were able to answer the bell and make the critical plays to win close games in the 4th quarter.