Keegs said:
Yeah i just don't get why the colts didn't trade up, or even offer too much to trade up if they wanted him so bad. He would be absolutely deadly on that team (from what we've seen so far). I am thrilled that he isn't with them and we have him. I figured they'd find some team willing to move down to the colts' slot (30th??) if the colts offered enough...
I'll go off the spelling bee and move onto what might be an actual debate.
Let's say the Colts wanted to get up ahead of us because they were thinking we would take Maroney. Then who would be there possible trade partners, someone between 16-20, since higher then that would cost too much to just leap frog us.
16 - Miami, short of a second round pick, it is possible that Indy could have made a move to get into that slot, but dropping down to 30 would have lost Miami the abilty to make a move for a top defensive player that they would need. But a possible trade.
17 - Minn, possible deal here, except Greenway fit thier system and he was there for the taking, with the other LB coming off the board, they surely would have been sucking wind at 30 to get one. (Though it ultimately worked out badly this year, they would not have been interested in dropping.)
18 - Dallas, no way they were dropping behind us, we would have snatched Carpenter away without blinking
19 - San Deigo, they were looking corner back, and with KC looking in the same direction, dropping back would have put them in a definite disadvantage.
20 - KC, also looking defense, they are not going to want to fall below Buffalo or Cinc, who would be looking in the same direction.
So in all of those situations Indy would have had to package proably thier third along with a second to make that deal worth someones while to make that big of a drop. Given that they needed those picks to keep restocking thier D, I doubt they would want to part with them.