- Joined
- Feb 19, 2007
- Messages
- 28,220
- Reaction score
- 30,864
Wrong UDFA. He was born too soon. Brady's true replacement won't have been born until after Brady was drafted.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.someone need to kidnap or shut Gisele up thenDude, Brady’s just entering his THIRD prime. We should be fine until about 2031
Do you really think 4 QBs are going in the top 10?The draft class offers a deep group of potential franchise QBs with Rosen, Darnold, Mayfield and Allen, but they are likely to go top 10. The secondary group of Rudolph and Jackson is too risky for my liking at #32.
so
someone need to kidnap or shut Gisele up then
Bridgewater for bridge guy?I've wondered why not a bridge guy like (I'm not naming any one particular player) Brees, Roth, Ryan, Rivers who finds a year or two with BB interesting and comes over until the Pats find the permanent solution.
Ride Brady until he's 50 if you can. Don't worry about the backup. And as long as BB is here, someone better than Keenum or Bridgewater will be available pretty quickly for Bill. Are we really worried about nothing?
Plus the cap space will be wayyy too large of a number.No. Get a young guy with a blank slate in the system and mold him. I don’t want another teams rejects.
I never said he is Brady replacementWrong UDFA. He was born too soon. Brady's true replacement won't have been born until after Brady was drafted.
Here’s what intrigues me:
We have a couple of 2nd’s to go with our 1st. Is it impossible that Bill trades up for a QB?
Obviously we don’t have the capital to trade up too high, but if a Baker Mayfield drops down to the later 1st round... well we’ve seen Bill pull off shocker moves before.
His parents are bringing him to school tomorrow for kindergarten registration.At this very moment Brady's replacement is trying to find the courage to ask his crush to the prom.
These guys obviously don't want to be backups, but we may be headed into a rare situation in which there are more than 32 viable QBs.
My my estimation, 23 teams have starters locked in for 2018 (NE, MIA, PIT, BAL, CIN, IND, TEN, HOU, OAK, LAC, KC, DAL, PHI, GB, DET, CHI, CAR, TB, ATL, NO, LAR, SEA, SF). That number may very well be higher, as it does not include Cousins, Bortles, Manning or any of Minnesota's QBs.
Now you add 10 vets with either successful starting experience, or whom have been projected as possible starters, potentially entering the market (Cousins, Smith, Taylor, Keenum, Bridgewater, Bradford, Bortles, Manning, Foles, McCarron).
Throw in Rosen, Darnold and Mayfield who will probably be counted on to start sometime in 2018, and you are looking at 36 QBs who will be viewed as starting caliber.
My point boils down to the fact that I am not comfortable with the prospect of drafting a project in the first two rounds. I would rather those picks either spent bolstering the roster for Brady's final years, or moving value to target a lower risk QB in 2019 or 2020.
Should that be the plan, and if cap space allows, there is at least potential that someone from this free agent class that could emerge as a suitable starter a couple years down the road.
The only way they could have kept Jimmy would have been to use the franchise tag. Way too much money plus he would have been very unhappy. Not a winning move.If they wanted to pay a bunch of money for a backup they would have kept Jimmy. They will try to get Brady's backup through the draft until they find someone they like. If that doesn't happen, they may dip into free agency and take a chance on a high or moderately priced veteran. But that wont happen while Brady is still here.
| 17 | 2K |
| 156 | 6K |
| 8 | 744 |
| 9 | 2K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 21 - May 6 (Through 26yrs)











