everlong
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2007
- Messages
- 9,494
- Reaction score
- 5,891
Good stats. Still lol. The difference is unlike us, they were nowhere near the top in the 70's; and Eason, who of course played when they beat us here in '86. They also beat us three times in the early 70's. We won the other five meetings in that stretch.
You can make a good case for the Oilers too.
Today's Bengals have won quite a bit, recently under Marvin Lewis.
Are they in any way, shape or form comparable to us this century? No.
The Oilers and the Bengals kept running into the Steelers or they might have had a shot. Also Cincinnati came really close to beating the 49ers twice whereas the Patriots got destroyed by the Bears and by the scoreboard it wasn't close vs the Packers, yes I know and lament all the arguments on how that could have been different.
Today's Bengals vs today's Patriots is like comparing the 70's Steelers to the 70's Patriots or Bengals. That in no way analogous to the Bengals vs Patriots of the 70's and 80's. They were peers in those decades who has some good, some bad and some ugly seasons. Overall in those decades they were both in the middle of the pack which does support your argument that they weren't the destitute franchise they were made out to be. It also supports the Kraft narrative which I support. His coming in was directly after a few of the worst seasons the Pats ever had. He supported the narrative and the rest is history.