- Joined
- Apr 3, 2006
- Messages
- 26,126
- Reaction score
- 52,125
It's not a matter of "screwing a trade partner." Belichick would make any move he deemed beneficial to the Patriots. Not even a question.
A player not being traded obviously doesn't mean a trade wasn't discussed. Again, this is obvious.
It's not a question of "evidence," it was what was roundly reported, including by credible sources such as Schefter. The reason it didn't happen was provided by Schefter. You don't believe this, which is fine, but pretending you know definitively what he reported didn't occur is silly.
You have "listed" nothing but your own speculations on what happened. Again, you're welcome to do that, as long as you know you're merely speculating.
Speculation requires reasonable conclusions drawn from facts. This isn’t speculation. There’s no historic example cited, from numerous books, reporters, and insiders of Belichick “bluffing” a player that he’ll trade him to another team so the player will decide not to retire and get serious about the Patriot way (senseless idea) , but there are many, many examples of actual trades.
It’s very obvious the Lions were willing to pony up the cash and trade compensation for Gronk, the Patriots were willing to trade him, and Gronk nixed the deal by using his retirement/not reporting card. There is no conflicting report about this, and the actual player is one of the sources. Lol.