andrewssix
On the Roster
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2007
- Messages
- 85
- Reaction score
- 294
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.This morning on ESPN radio, Jeremy Schaap was discussing Brady ....and to paraphrase...'If Brady hadn't won in '14 and '16, Peyton Manning would have owned the title GOAT while Brady would be the QB that hadn't won in 10 years'
Note: the main topic of his segment was the "ageless Tom Brady"
This morning on ESPN radio, Jeremy Schaap was discussing Brady ....and to paraphrase...'If Brady hadn't won in '14 and '16, Peyton Manning would have owned the title GOAT while Brady would be the QB that hadn't won in 10 years'
Note: the main topic of his segment was the "ageless Tom Brady"
Don't understand this argument. It has always been Montana-Brady. I've never heard of Montana-Manning. How did manning suddenly come into this discussion? No doubt manning is a great QB but he's not in the goat discussion.
In one year...Also, if Manning had Belichick, he would have won 24 Super Bowls.
I wonder how many more of these types of things exist? Brady is just a GOAT on so many levels.I needed to post this somewhere, and the "favorite Brady and Belichick records" thread is locked
This morning on ESPN radio, Jeremy Schaap was discussing Brady ....and to paraphrase...'If Brady hadn't won in '14 and '16, Peyton Manning would have owned the title GOAT while Brady would be the QB that hadn't won in 10 years'
Note: the main topic of his segment was the "ageless Tom Brady"
Also, if Manning had Belichick, he would have won 24 Super Bowls.
A lot of what ifs. If the what ifs were in our favor Brady would have won the Super Bowl every year. It gets ridiculous when people go so far as trying to change the past to fit their agenda.