I agree - -though Atlanta fans might have a different opinion on that ...
It's hard to call the first two quarters plus "terrible." They were awful for NE, but ATL had something to do with that.
Agree.
My definition of a terrible game is a game with way too many turnovers and penalties and generally bad play.
But, there were only two turnovers in the first half. Both on the Pats. You can argue that Brady threw a dumb pass, but the Blount fumble was forced.
Too many penalties? Only 13 were accepted in the entire game. I don't know where that stands in terms of SB averages, but in general the refs "let them play" and there were really no disputed calls. One can argue that the Pats got away with one that would have offset the critical Q4 Holding call on ATL, but that's part of the game.
"Generally bad play?" Belichick has said that he didn't think the Pats played poorly in the first half...they just failed to finish. And, sorry, but Atlanta's 28 points didn't just materialize out of thin air on the Score Board. They put them there.
The only things close to genuinely "bad" plays was Gostkowski's running into his own Onside kick and Brady's pick. The Holding Call against Mathews on Long was forced by Long. It wasn't a bad play by the Falcon, but a great rush by Long forcing a desperation penalty, as was one of INT calls on Butler deep in NE territory. He extended the Atlanta drive and gave the Pats a chance to make a play to stop a TD, which they didn't...
So, OK, you can split hairs and say the game was great for the Comeback, but you can't say the game itself was "terrible" until the end.