- Joined
- Sep 9, 2008
- Messages
- 32,634
- Reaction score
- 23,169
I don’t mind “big nickel” in the sense of using 3 safeties out of the 5 DB alignment, or at least that’s how we’ve been referring to it for a long time, anyway. We’ve been seeing that for years, and having guys like McCourty, Harmon, and Chung allows us to utilize those versatile skill sets.Rowe is our starting outside corner (along with Gilmore). Hopefully, we sign someone better so that he can be the backup outside corner.
I would like us to have a good nickel back. I suspect that Jones is somewhat of a tweener between playing inside and outside.
IMHO, there needs to be less big nickel and more regular, old-fashsioned nickel. But we need the corner to fill the role, and ideally a backup.
For me the ideal is 9 defensive backs who can play defensive back, 5 corners and 4 safeties. Obviously, one of the corners and one of the safeties needs to a primary player on ST's.
DEFENSIVE BACKS (11)
outside corner (3) - Gilmore, Rowe plus one more
nickel (2) - 1 plus a backup (since this is our base defense)
free safety (2) - McCourty plus a backup
strong safety (2) - Chung plus a backup
special teams specialists (2)
What I don’t want to see are the 4 safety looks by including Richards in the mix, like we saw in the KC and PHI games. I don’t even know what you’d call it? The “big dime?” 4/6 safeties.