manxman2601
Hall of Fame Poster
I don’t mean this as a shot at Mike Mayock but just to highlight the mindfield it could be to find Brady’s successor.
I don’t mean this as a shot at Mike Mayock but just to highlight the mindfield it could be to find Brady’s successor.
It won't be easy which is why I wouldn't hate a terrible season if it puts us in position to draft a sure fire stud QB the year after.
The hit rate after that drops off significantly.
No please not Finley here.Finley information
No please not Finley here.
No please not Finley here.
I am a huge Finley fan, but his throws would have to live between the numbers, because pro cb’s will eat him alive on deep outs.
Brady can put heat on balls thoughThat’s where Brady lives so it wouldn’t be much of a transition.
Brady can put heat on balls though
Tua’s the finest prospect I’ve ever evaluated,” Dilfer says. “He learns better, throws better than anybody, moves better than anybody. He’s tough. He can change the next rep, you give a tiny thing here to, and the next rep he can change. It’s just too bad he played poorly the last time we saw him., he’d tell you that too. … He’s special. But he’s 5' 11", and we the same conversation around Kyler, around Baker.
I thought Dwayne should’ve waited, but he’s the most like Tom Brady of anyone we’ve had. He sees it like Tom, he works at it, he plays that way. He plays on time, with his intellectual process. I don’t want to compare anyone to Brady, but he’s Tom Brady-ish.”
I don’t know what people think of Trent Dilfer as a QB evaluator, but in the latest MMQB, he calls Haskins “Brady-ish” and says Tua is the best QB he’s evaluated.
Should teams wait until 2020 to draft a quarterback?
My preference would be to draft a QB this year, and other next year. We need a replacement for Hoyer in 2020. This would give us two in-house possibilities. And yes, the hope would be that one could eventually be our #1, or not. I would be fine if we used any one of our first seven picks on a QB.
To wait until 2020 would mean that we would need to extend Hoyer, or simply assume that the 2020 QB will be good enough to replace Hoyer.
My preference would be to draft a QB this year, and other next year. We need a replacement for Hoyer in 2020. This would give us two in-house possibilities. And yes, the hope would be that one could eventually be our #1, or not. I would be fine if we used any one of our first seven picks on a QB.
To wait until 2020 would mean that we would need to extend Hoyer, or simply assume that the 2020 QB will be good enough to replace Hoyer.
There are some monster quarterbacks in the 2020 draft. Tua, Fromm, Herbert, erhlinger, etc.
If we don't trade 56 for Josh Rosen, then I don't want to draft a QB until our 6th-rounder, at the earliest. Too many major holes that will require All of our picks from the first 4 rounds to fill.
If we don't trade 56 for Josh Rosen, then I don't want to draft a QB until our 6th-rounder, at the earliest. Too many major holes that will require All of our picks from the first 4 rounds to fill.