Joey007
Pro Bowl Player
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2010
- Messages
- 15,945
- Reaction score
- 20,993
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.
I mean I actually wanted real answers here and not have the results get hijackedWhere’s the choice of the guy in the white suit who murdered two guys in Atlanta before the Super Bowl?
In a vacuum. But remember that Haynesworth had spikes in his cletes. He absolutely could’ve killed that man with that act.Swinging a helmet with full force into someone's head is more dangerous to me than stomping. But anything involving brute force to the head is obviously a gigantic problem.
In a vacuum. But remember that Haynesworth had spikes in his cletes. He absolutely could’ve killed that man with that act.
Some people missed this: last night when Garrett was down on his back with another Steeler on top of him, Pouncey was kicking him in the helmet.I’m asking because I’ve been back and forth on this in terms of what is the worst act.
For those who need a refresher over what Haynesworth did...
Two of the worst on the field acts I’ve ever seen. But which one is worse?
I don’t think people have missed it. They’re just letting it go because of what Garrett did before the fact.Some people missed this: last night when Garrett was down on his back with another Steeler on top of him, Pouncey was kicking him in the helmet.
Kicking a guy in the head when he's down on his back with someone on top of him is not excusable.I don’t think people have missed it. They’re just letting it go because of what Garrett did before the fact.
I mean I agree. I understand why the response happened. But you can’t set any precedent to allow that either.Kicking a guy in the head when he's down on his back with someone on top of him is not excusable.