PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

Peter King doesn't know how NFL Schedule is generated!


Status
Not open for further replies.

PYPER

Third String But Playing on Special Teams
Joined
Sep 14, 2004
Messages
796
Reaction score
189
For those that mistakenly think this hack is a quality writer....

How can a sportswriter who has been following the NFL for 20+ years not know how the NFL generates its schedule? Its one thing for a 15 year old poster on a message board to not know it but for someone of his pedigree, this is embarrassing. I'm sorry but sports fans deserve better.

From his MMQB on 12/10/12 (Fine Fifteen)

"3. Denver (10-3). As the indefatigable Mike Reiss points out, Manning-Brady XIV is assured for 2013 now that Denver and New England have both clinched their divisions. The 2013 schedule metric, planned long before Peyton Manning signed with Denver last March, has the AFC West winner playing at the AFC East winner (as in 2012, for some bizarre reason), and sets up the XVIth time Manning's team will play Brady's team since Brady took the starting job for New England in 2001. "





The part in bold reveals his ignorance. The AFC East winner and the AFC West winner play each other in 2013 as well as 2012 because division winners from the same conference play each other EVERY YEAR!!!



For those not familiar with the NFL's schedule format....They have a system where each team plays their divisional opponents twice. That takes care of six of the sixteen games.



Four games are then scheduled against each team within one of the other divisions in the same conference as them. The division they play rotates every so that each division plays each other every three years. That explains ten of the sixteen games.


Four games are then scheduled against each team within a division from the other conference (AFC vs NFC). The specific division they play rotates every year so that each division plays one another every four years. You now have an explanation for 14 of the 16 games.


The final two games are scheduled based on where you finished in your divisional standings the previous year. Teams play teams from the other two divisions from the same conference who finished in the same place as they did. In other words, 1st place plays first place; 2nd place plays 2nd place; 3rd plays 3rd, etc...


If two teams from the same conference finish in the same position within their respective division, they will play EVERY year. It's not a coincidence...IT'S A WELL KNOWN FORMULA!!!


How can Peter King not know this?????



 
For those that mistakenly think this hack is a quality writer....

How can a sportswriter who has been following the NFL for 20+ years not know how the NFL generates its schedule? Its one thing for a 15 year old poster on a message board to not know it but for someone of his pedigree, this is embarrassing. I'm sorry but sports fans deserve better.

He's not complaining about the fact that they play one another.

He's griping about the fact that they play each other in Foxboro, as they did in 2012.

As it turns out, you can't avoid having some back-to-back games like this, but there's no reason for the AFC/NFC East to continually have to do home-home-home-away-away-away every single year. They should be able to rotate it every six years.
 
Maybe it has something to do with the fact that the last two times ('09 & '11) they played in Denver.

Actually 2013 makes the home games even 8-8 since 1995

1995 Home
1996 Home
1997 @ Denver
1998 @ Denver
1999 Home
2000 @ Denver
2001 @ Denver
2002 Home
2003 @ Denver
2005 @ Denver
2006 Home
2008 Home
2009 @ Denver
2011 @ Denver
2012 Home
2013 Home
 
Last edited:
Everything in Peter King's world is bizarre. It makes it sort of fun and magical for him.
 
has the AFC West winner playing at the AFC East winner (as in 2012, for some bizarre reason)

The operative word here is 'at'.

He's saying it's weird that the AFC West winner plays @ the AFC East winner 2 years in a row before even knowing the results of the 2012 season. Which it is.
 
If, somehow :rolleyes: the Chargers won the AFC West the last two seasons instead of the Broncos, and the Patriots were forced to travel to SD 2x in a row, I'm guessing we'd take issue with that as well.
 
For those that mistakenly think this hack is a quality writer....

How can a sportswriter who has been following the NFL for 20+ years not know how the NFL generates its schedule? Its one thing for a 15 year old poster on a message board to not know it but for someone of his pedigree, this is embarrassing. I'm sorry but sports fans deserve better.

From his MMQB on 12/10/12 (Fine Fifteen)

"3. Denver (10-3). As the indefatigable Mike Reiss points out, Manning-Brady XIV is assured for 2013 now that Denver and New England have both clinched their divisions. The 2013 schedule metric, planned long before Peyton Manning signed with Denver last March, has the AFC West winner playing at the AFC East winner (as in 2012, for some bizarre reason), and sets up the XVIth time Manning's team will play Brady's team since Brady took the starting job for New England in 2001. "





The part in bold reveals his ignorance. The AFC East winner and the AFC West winner play each other in 2013 as well as 2012 because division winners from the same conference play each other EVERY YEAR!!!



For those not familiar with the NFL's schedule format....They have a system where each team plays their divisional opponents twice. That takes care of six of the sixteen games.



Four games are then scheduled against each team within one of the other divisions in the same conference as them. The division they play rotates every so that each division plays each other every three years. That explains ten of the sixteen games.


Four games are then scheduled against each team within a division from the other conference (AFC vs NFC). The specific division they play rotates every year so that each division plays one another every four years. You now have an explanation for 14 of the 16 games.


The final two games are scheduled based on where you finished in your divisional standings the previous year. Teams play teams from the other two divisions from the same conference who finished in the same place as they did. In other words, 1st place plays first place; 2nd place plays 2nd place; 3rd plays 3rd, etc...


If two teams from the same conference finish in the same position within their respective division, they will play EVERY year. It's not a coincidence...IT'S A WELL KNOWN FORMULA!!!


How can Peter King not know this?????





You missed King's point.....Why does the West winner travel to the East winner's stadium 2 years in a row
 
Just imagine if they both finish first again next year and the Broncos have to travel here again next year. His head is gonna explode! :bricks:
 
If, somehow :rolleyes: the Chargers won the AFC West the last two seasons instead of the Broncos, and the Patriots were forced to travel to SD 2x in a row, I'm guessing we'd take issue with that as well.

Can only speak for myself but I wouldn't
 
Just imagine if they both finish first again next year and the Broncos have to travel here again next year. His head is gonna explode! :bricks:

2014 is AFC East vs AFC West. Pats will host the Broncos regardless of divisional place. Ju

And Denver could host NE in 15 and 16. And will host in 17
 
Thread title should be changed to the more generic but equally true "Peter King Is An Idiot".

A gem from his column today:

Peter King said:
Since 2005, Super Bowl winners are 12-0 on the road in the playoffs.

as if that's some sort of meaningful, incredible stat.

Hey Peter -- care to tell us how many Super Bowl winners lost a playoff game on the road?
 
Thread title should be changed to the more generic but equally true "Peter King Is An Idiot".

A gem from his column today:



as if that's some sort of meaningful, incredible stat.

Hey Peter -- care to tell us how many Super Bowl winners lost a playoff game on the road?

Man you guys are rough. I'm no Peter King homer but I read his article and I don't dislike him. I'm thinking he is pointing out the fact that the SB winners were lower seeds and had play a lot of games on the road vs being a higher seed and playing at home.

To make his point in the previous 7 years (1998-2004) The SB winners won 5 road games. Baltimore won 2, the only SB winner to win multiple games on the road.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.


Thursday Patriots Notebook 4/25: News and Notes
Patriots Kraft ‘Involved’ In Decision Making?  Zolak Says That’s Not the Case
MORSE: Final First Round Patriots Mock Draft
Slow Starts: Stark Contrast as Patriots Ponder Which Top QB To Draft
Wednesday Patriots Notebook 4/24: News and Notes
Tuesday Patriots Notebook 4/23: News and Notes
MORSE: Final 7 Round Patriots Mock Draft, Matthew Slater News
Bruschi’s Proudest Moment: Former LB Speaks to MusketFire’s Marshall in Recent Interview
Monday Patriots Notebook 4/22: News and Notes
Patriots News 4-21, Kraft-Belichick, A.J. Brown Trade?
Back
Top