- Joined
- Dec 22, 2008
- Messages
- 15,912
- Reaction score
- 18,041
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.
Seems more accurate
He was drafted in the 1st which means there is a 5th year option. So it would be 2 years as they would pick up the option.
Yea unless Belichick believes Cooks is the next Antonio Brown in his offense, it doesn't really make much sense to pay out the nose for another WR.Lol. I don't understand it. I do think we will sign a wr. Either resign floyd or maybe go after marshall.
Do not know if this is true and understand the doubts. But Cooks ate us up in the joint practices, BB seems to really like Cooks, and I think NE is looking for more top end WR talent given the success of press man to man coverage versus us in the playoffs. Cooks is young - certainly understand us trying to get our hands on a player like that. We may not have all the details.
Philly and Tenn have more draft capital and are more desperate.I don't think the last word has been spoken on this.
I wonder how big the deal was they were discussing. 2017 is the last year of Brees' contract. Would they be in the mix for Garropollo?
Options must be picked up by early May right????He was drafted in the 1st which means there is a 5th year option. So it would be 2 years as they would pick up the option.
He's 23. We'd hardly be paying for past productions.I would think Brees by himself would help a WR's stock/price.
Belichick has been able to find 1000 yard receivers who haven't done/don't cost anything. Cooks is a great receiver, just doesn't seem right that BB would pay for past production.
| 9 | 2K |
| 13 | 441 |
| 10 | 753 |
| 9 | 2K |
| 13 | 2K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 7 - April 22 (Through 26yrs)











