Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.67 catches last year for a guy who's only 25? If Welker was black, he'd be considered the next big thing.
I've never had a post change my mind so quickly. I now want this deal to occur when forty-five seconds ago I didn't. Good post.
Same here. But a 2nd rounder? With Chambers and Booker ahead of him, Welker has never been the "go-to guy" before and that is an awful lot to give up for a mostly career backup. I'm not sure if Welker is that much of an improvement over Caldwell and Gaffney. Also I don't think Welker has near as much potential as, let's say, an Anthony Gonzalez, or a Jason Hill, or an Aundrae Allison, etc.
67 catches last year for a guy who's only 25? If Welker was black, he'd be considered the next big thing.
You sound like a moron.
67 catches last year for a guy who's only 25? If Welker was black, he'd be considered the next big thing.
well somebody was bound to say it.
I think some people agree with this but won't admit to it.
From PFT
If the Pats don't use the poison pill, and if the Fins match the deal, look for the NFLPA to cry foul. Why? Because there was a specific effort by the league and the union to negotiate the poison pill out of the CBA after last year's tit-for-tat involving the Vikings and the Seahawks. But an impasse was reached, and the device is still on the books.
Figured I'd get some controversy started. Can't let you have all the fun there, Keegs.
well somebody was bound to say it.
I think some people agree with this but won't admit to it.
Guys like Allison and Gonzalez won't be around at #60. Jason Hill might be available, but who knows after his combine performance. Welker gives you someone who can step in now. Anyone they draft (outside of Calvin Johnson) will need time to develop. They can grab someone to develop later on. This receiver class is ridiculously deep. Stanley, McKnight, L. Robinson, Higgins, Cornelius, Clowney, Stuckey...
Welker makes Troy Brown look like Charlie Brown... sign him up asap...
He is Troy Brown's replacement... plus some...
BB will teach Wes everything about the db position as well...
Welker is the PERFECT Patriot.
I've said this years ago.
Gonzalez won't but Allison may slip there. Do we still draft WR high if we get Welker? 60 can also be used on LB, CB, S, while we can draft WR at 24 or 28. Welker limits our options, but if he's worth it then go ahead.
I'm not under the impression that this is anything special as a draft.
Gonzalez won't but Allison may slip there. Do we still draft WR high if we get Welker? 60 can also be used on LB, CB, S, while we can draft WR at 24 or 28. Welker limits our options, but if he's worth it then go ahead.
I've been on THIS bandwagon very early in several posts. I'm happy to see BB agree with me...on this one (though I hope he gets back to me before he signs Sammy Morris to anything but a vet minimum deal.) All the positives Welker brings have been well documented in the thread. What I DON'T understand are those nay sayers.
First, while seemingly a real NEED position, WR WAS NOT the reason we didn't get to the superbowl, and even if we stayed pat, don't you think that a full off season of work in the system wouldn't improve Gaffney and Caldwell.
Second, its become fashionable to speculate of the absolute neccessity to have a WR who can SPREAD THE FIELD. WHY?? Was our offense in the bottom ten last year? Was Brady limited to UNDER 3000 yds. Hey if we need someone to "spread the field" just resign Bethel, he was good a clearing out zones.
There is really only one guy we could get that would dramatically "improve" our WR corp merely by being on the team is Randy Moss (BTW, I'd give up a 2nd for him too, ) The Curtis', Stallworth's, & Bennett's of the world would also be nice, but they'd cost much more in cap space, be a lot less versitile, a lot less durable, and STILL have just as many questions about them as Welker...if not more.
| 11 | 2K |
| 13 | 690 |
| 14 | 3K |
| 15 | 236 |
| 13 | 971 |
From our archive - this week all-time:
June 7 - June 22 (Through 26yrs)











