rkarp1
Rotational Player and Threatening Starter's Job
- Joined
- May 19, 2016
- Messages
- 1,488
- Reaction score
- 1,708
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.fair enoughPettus has graded out very well in his limited appearances.
All came down to scheme/coverage and health.
the staff had better options with Woodson, Hawkins and Pettus in this scheme
I don't think money had anything to do with it, as the Pats ate much of what was owed anyways
why?fair enough
I'm 100% fine with the team moving on if they think Pettus is a reasonable backup. It didn't seem that was the case when Sauders was signed.
why?
Pettus has played 45 defensive snaps, Saunders 0
Pettus has played in 75% of the ST snaps, Saunders 0
I think they felt there is not much of a developmental scope with peppers and dugger and both will be off next season.fair enough
I'm 100% fine with the team moving on if they think Pettus is a reasonable backup. It didn't seem that was the case when Sauders was signed.
Pettus, Saunders and even Hawkins are solid rotational safeties. None of them are leading this team in solo tackles every season the way Dugger did...
I tend to agree.Saunders is a solid Sub-JAG, lucky to have a spot on a practice squad, nothing more. And Pettus ain't no great shakes either.
We still have the Worst backup DBs in the Entire league.
That's probably why he was releasedSaunders is a solid Sub-JAG, lucky to have a spot on a practice squad, nothing more. And Pettus ain't no great shakes either.
We still have the Worst backup DBs in the Entire league.
Daniels reported it on Monday. I must have missed it.
Saunders was re-signed to PS.
Well, the team has chosen Pettus.I am not saying that Pettus s/b the teams 1st option as their back up S.
| 13 | 592 |
| 13 | 418 |
| 7 | 2K |
| 4 | 1K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 2 - April 17 (Through 26yrs)











