fightingirish595
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2012
- Messages
- 8,725
- Reaction score
- 5,458
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Yep not saying he's very insightful, just thought his Nantucket jibe was pretty good, and I do more or less agree with his take on the Tom vs Bill saga, his rationale fits the facts pretty well.Meh, Curran (or "Prentice McCray" as he was known here ...) lost his fastball IMHO a couple of years ago. This column doesn't reflect any more insight than Prentice could glean from this board ...
I'd rather take a shot on Hurts or Anthony Gordon later on. Next year is really the year to grab a QB if Stidham stinks.
I liked the picture of Bill at his dining room table settling in for the draft. But I didn't see a glass of orange juice.Nice one from Tom E. Curran:
There once was a coach on Nantucket. Who in the first round just said …
Ref: Curran: Calculated Pats stock up for the weekend
I don't understand the idea of drafting a quarterback to give Stidham the "desired competition." If Stidham needs a rookie challenger to light a fire under his butt, he doesn't deserve to be on the New England roster.
The competition might not be any good, and crucially, whoever is picked is unlikely to have the training camp and preseason time to show what he can do. People on this site who follow the college game say that next year's draft has a strong crop of quarterbacks. If Stidham fails, the Pats will have a losing record and an opportunity to pick a QB rated higher than anyone they could get this year at this point in the draft.We need competition for Stidham because he might not be any good.
The competition might not be any good, and crucially, whoever is picked is unlikely to have the training camp and preseason time to show what he can do. People on this site who follow the college game say that next year's draft has a strong crop of quarterbacks. If Stidham fails, the Pats will have a losing record and an opportunity to pick a QB rated higher than anyone they could get this year at this point in the draft.
I’m nervous that we take an Eason or Fromm in the 3rd. Hope I’m wrong.
I don't understand the idea of drafting a quarterback to give Stidham the "desired competition." If Stidham needs a rookie challenger to light a fire under his butt, he doesn't deserve to be on the New England roster.
I'm fine with taking a quarterback in the sixth or seventh round, but not in the second or third. As a matter of fact, as a late round pick I sort of like Ben DiNucci, who has quarterbacked a very successful James Madison team down here in Virginia.What’s the harm in taking one this year and one next? We should probably take one every year until we get someone we can be confident will be a franchise QB.
I don't understand the idea of drafting a quarterback to give Stidham the "desired competition." If Stidham needs a rookie challenger to light a fire under his butt, he doesn't deserve to be on the New England roster.
This from the guy posting "WOAT" in an attempt to snarkily disparage and/or humiliate those with whom he disagrees
It’s more hedging bets. Stidham was a fourth round pick and Bill had to know Tom leaving was a possibility. If he felt strongly that stidham was cant miss, he’d have picked him higher than the fourth. The back up QB is also an older journeyman on a one year contract.
If Stidham isn't a good quarterback, I don't want to wait and be forced to start a rookie next year.
I have seen quite a bit of Hurts and Fromm. Seen them play more than Stidham. But just off of memory Stidham's Arm talent is better than both those guys in my opinion in terms of arm strength/accuracy
We hear this about everyone though, so color me skeptical. Remember when people on this board seriously thought we could trade Ryan Mallett to Cleveland for the #6 overall based on reports on how the Pats really like him?BB's current opinion of Stidham is surely based almost entirely on what he's seen of him in preseason and in practices. I'm sure he cares not at all what round he drafted him in. It's been reported that based on Stidham's preseason and Belichicks noises about him, he would have gone in the lower half of the first round if he were re-drafted with this year's class. Hence the lack of interest in Love et al.
| 13 | 593 |
| 11 | 565 |
| 23 | 736 |
| 10 | 724 |
| 15 | 1K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 2 - April 17 (Through 26yrs)











